Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	Gregory W. Krajewski
Date/Time:	Mon, January 14, 2002 at 12:20 AM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows 98
Subject:	You misunderstood me....No current dot org owner would lose their domain.
Message:
A "grandfather clause" would allow current dot org holders to keep their name, WITHOUT having to be an organization.  THAT would be fair and equitable.  All new registrants would have to be legitimate organizations. Of course alll this is pure speculation of what ICANN will do.  My opinion is that ICANN will need to identify whether or not "org" and "net" will become restricted if they adopt rollouts which will be "restricted" in the future. An indicator of things to come maybe already "foretold"...in that ICANN is now using ICANN.org for it's main address.... Gregory

Message Thread:

• The economics of a restricted TLD....The good, the bad and the ugly... — Gregory W. Krajewski, January 12 @ 7:36 PM (1/5)
• The economics are very good - if they do it right — Garry Anderson, January 13 @ 10:27 PM (1/4)
• My guess is they will implement a "grandfather clause" for current "org" owners... — Gregory W. Krajewski, January 13 @ 10:45 PM (1/3)
• This would NOT be fair and equitable — Garry Anderson, January 13 @ 11:10 PM (1/2)
• You misunderstood me....No current dot org owner would lose their domain. — Gregory W. Krajewski, January 14 @ 12:20 AM (1/1)
• icann.org — dtobias, January 14 @ 6:27 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy