Dear Mr Lynn and Mr Cerf, though I am angry, the logic of my argument is rational
and reasoned.The following is my honest opinion about the Sunrise situation.
Please
contradict any single one of these statements:
ICANN did nothing beforehand, to
stop all this from happening or ensure that rules were kept.
ICANN wanted a (bull*)
Sunrise put in place.
ICANN do nothing now, about this MASS FRAUD.
ICANN do not
even enter into dialogue with us.
ICANN call themselves OPEN - therefore this is
a LIE.
You both admit that cybersquatting disputes are less likely in a regulated
TLD.
UN WIPO, US DoC and ICANN must have always known that.
THEY ALL know restricted
TLDs for trademarks would remove the need for Sunrise.
Sunrise gives priority to
Big Business over people to common words - therefore abridges what words people can
use.
Sunrise will not solve 'consumer confusion', 'trademark conflict' or stop
anybody 'passing off'.
Sunrise will never guarentee all trademarks can use their
mark - Apple Computers will still want apple.anything - Caterpillar tractors will
still want cat.anything.
Therefore - THEY ALL ARE CORRUPT.