Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	nicholasbernstein
Date/Time:	Tue, January 22, 2002 at 12:40 AM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows 98
Subject:	410
Message:
If I recall correctly, 410 is one of those very vocal IOD .web supporters. Its too bad but I don't see .web being added by ICANN for a very long time (at least 3 or 4 years) and even if they do it will be as a restricted TLD (like .aero or .musuem as opposed to an open one like .info).

Message Thread:

• What's up with .info ? — breeves, January 22 @ 3:57 AM (4/19)
• It will take time — Cation, January 23 @ 11:13 PM (0/0)
• Most trademark dot infos will point to dot com — Garry Anderson, January 23 @ 8:35 AM (0/0)
• .info is stuck in limbo until the sunrise frauds get reallocated — spot2, January 22 @ 5:57 AM (2/3)
• Agree!!!! .info is the killer app in extensions!!! — moler, January 22 @ 12:32 AM (0/0)
• Um.....? — 410, January 22 @ 9:07 AM (1/1)
• correction — spot2, January 22 @ 10:28 AM (0/0)
• .INFO is still a youngin'... give it some time — ebiz, January 22 @ 4:50 AM (2/12)
• Agreed!!! Speculators like us are always 2 years ahead of big businesses ;-) — moler, January 22 @ 12:37 AM (1/1)
• Not really mole — Cation, January 25 @ 12:20 AM (0/0)
• good analysis spot2 and ebiz (410 = FW) and I wish to add — antipathy, January 22 @ 9:36 AM (2/9)
• FW? — 410, January 24 @ 3:20 AM (1/2)
• 410 you may be right, but you are still a f*ck wit - regards — antipathy, January 24 @ 9:43 AM (1/1)
• Oh, please — 410, January 26 @ 1:04 AM (0/0)
• 410 — nicholasbernstein, January 22 @ 12:40 AM (1/5)
• Well.... — 410, January 24 @ 3:18 AM (2/4)
• 410, we agree one one thing - the evident corruption of ICANN — antipathy, January 24 @ 9:45 AM (0/0)
• .web and open TLDs — Garry Anderson, January 24 @ 9:28 AM (1/2)
• Gary — nicholasbernstein, January 24 @ 9:44 AM (1/1)
• We agree on what is an OPEN TLD — Garry Anderson, January 24 @ 10:41 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy