Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	vera-city
Date/Time:	Tue, February 5, 2002 at 5:37 AM GMT
Browser:	AOL Browser V5.0 using Windows 98
Subject:	Question: Might it be that potential plaintiffs are awaiting Landrush Redux?  eom
Message:
.

Message Thread:

• While everyoneTALKS.... I shall be taking Action! — GetYourPages, February 4 @ 4:42 PM (2/16)
• Question: Might it be that potential plaintiffs are awaiting Landrush Redux?  eom — vera-city, February 5 @ 5:37 AM (2/2)
• Let's Use our heads for a second — GetYourPages, February 5 @ 10:50 PM (0/0)
• Opinion: There is a difference between revealing the truth... — vera-city, February 5 @ 5:44 AM (0/0)
• Sunrise abridges the right of common people to common words — Garry Anderson, February 4 @ 10:14 PM (2/12)
• I certanly hope none of you give up the fight — GetYourPages, February 5 @ 9:33 PM (1/2)
• I had a TRADEMARK and STILL Got the SHAFT — GetYourPages, February 5 @ 9:47 PM (1/1)
• Is that you Patrick? (eom) — AfghanTM, February 8 @ 7:06 PM (0/0)
• AFILIAS is CHEATING — sgupta, February 4 @ 11:28 PM (1/8)
• If you charge for registering "NONE" data, you are a crook... — richard_henderson, February 5 @ 12:14 AM (1/7)
• ICANN have ultimate responsibility — Garry Anderson, February 5 @ 12:40 AM (1/6)
• Need a Class Action Suit — sgupta, February 5 @ 12:44 AM (1/5)
• Refunds — investor, February 5 @ 1:44 AM (3/4)
• a fraudulent application is just that, a fraudulent application — antipathy, February 5 @ 12:32 AM (0/0)
• This is NOT just about losing money — Garry Anderson, February 5 @ 9:52 AM (0/0)
• Afilias Must Not Be Allowed To Profit From Fradulent Rgistartions Twice  eom — investor, February 5 @ 1:46 AM (1/1)
• Maybe they won't Profit. — GetYourPages, February 5 @ 9:52 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy