Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	richard_henderson
Date/Time:	Fri, February 8, 2002 at 10:53 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.0 using Windows 98
Subject:	ICANN's accreditation to scam...
Message:
If ICANN gives accreditation to companies (like Yesnic) that appear to break rules, scam the public, and then ICANN continues to give them accreditation... isn't ICANN party to their fraudulent business actions? If ICANN condones their conduct, and continues to accredit them, then isn't ICANN guilty of abusing the consumer too? If you can do anything and get away with it, what exactly does ICANN accreditation mean? And as for 007names, their record speaks for itself. We have all been victims of scams, and the so-called regulating body does sweet fuck all about it. ICANN just presides over it all. The Subcommittee for Telecommunications and the Internet (chaired by Fred Upton) just presides over it all. But who protects the consumer?

Message Thread:

• http://www.domainpeople.com/biz1.cfm — domainboy, February 7 @ 1:53 AM (2/10)
• domainboy rocks! — moler, February 8 @ 4:44 PM (0/0)
• 007Names.com --- another bidding system (but $80 downpayment to bid)... blah (eom) — EBIZ, February 7 @ 2:11 AM (1/8)
• 007Names and Mustard Seed or 007Names/MustardSeed — antipathy, February 7 @ 8:29 PM (1/7)
• 007names gamed the system, we all know that — moler, February 8 @ 4:51 PM (1/6)
• ICANN Registrar's Licence or ICANN Internet Scam Licence — antipathy, February 8 @ 8:14 PM (1/5)
• ICANN's accreditation to scam... — richard_henderson, February 8 @ 10:53 PM (1/4)
• The evidence is overwhelming — Garry Anderson, February 9 @ 8:48 AM (1/3)
• there were some honest registrars in the .info launch, but — antipathy, February 9 @ 10:43 AM (1/2)
• Honest Registrars — Garry Anderson, February 9 @ 11:03 AM (1/1)
• I think the events of the Afilias Ltd. .info launch supports — antipathy, February 10 @ 8:44 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy