Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	dtobias
Date/Time:	Wed, February 13, 2002 at 2:49 PM GMT (Wed, February 13, 2002 at 9:49 AM EST)
Browser:	Netscape Communicator V5.0 using Windows dows
Score:	5
Subject:	The article is there, but...
Message:
See the link below to the *real* LA Times version of the article you posted.  Note carefully that there is no mention of this "Nomad Group" that the poster on this forum keeps talking about... the sentence about them in between "Other names could be more popular." and "The '.name' suffix for individuals" seems to be a plant.  (And don't tell me that the LA Times edited it out for legal reasons... I read the article a couple of days ago, while I was trying unsuccessfully to find the other supposed LA Times article posted here, and there was no Nomad reference there then either.)  It looks like we've got a real fraudster on this forum... you know, you can get sued for reposting copyrighted articles, especially when you alter them to make it seem like the authors said things they really didn't.       --Dan Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dantobias.com/
Link:	LA Times article on new domains

Message Thread:

• Newest Suffixes Help to Increase Net's Population — Casino, February 13 @ 8:31 AM (3/5)
• Fool — spot2, February 14 @ 1:53 AM (1/1)
• Rajesh? — Garry Anderson, February 14 @ 9:33 AM (0/0)
• The article is there, but... — dtobias, February 13 @ 2:49 PM (0/0)
• ...and the URL for the article you posted yesterday...? — richard_henderson, February 13 @ 8:41 AM (1/1)
• According to Carl Werner — Casino, February 13 @ 10:56 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy