I agree completely with you, John.
ICANN is CONSCIOUSLY presiding over all this
corruption. Whether it is 007names or the Yesnic examples (which Vint said he would
"take a look at" then he once again fails to enter any dialogue with this forum)...
it all points to the same fact:
Unscrupulous registrars can get away with almost
anything, because ICANN continue to sanction and accredit them, even if they have
been shown to act fraudulently. This gives the clear signal: "do what you like -
the consumer doesn't matter"
Notwithstanding there are some honest registrars out
there, this is a corrupt industry and it is now being administered in a corrupt way.
The DoC subcommittee chaired by Congressman Fred Upton is aware of what's going on,
and must also therefore be held accountable.
It is totally clear that corruption
is being tolerated.
It is totally clear that ICANN wants to avoid dialogue.
is totally clear that ICANN is NOT "open and transparent".
They set up this forum,
but its all window-dressing : they don't take it seriously, and when very serious
and fair-minded issues are raised, what does Vint Cerf say:
"I'll take a look at
it"... then silence ... no dialogue... and the corrupt registrars just keep right
on trading... with ICANN's blessing... ICANN lists and accredits and advertises them
... and the consumer can be abused or cheated again and again and again...
sense is Vint Cerf "the father of the internet"?
He knows exactly what's going
But he is evading us all.