Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
||Wed, March 6, 2002 at 7:18 AM GMT
||Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.0 using Windows 98
I thought you couldn't transfer Sunrise names for 180 days?|
Why should a challenge
of a false (?) Trademark be terminated just because the ownership is transferred
to a so-called third party, in breach of the 180 day embargo on transfers?
get the logic.
The right to challenge this name remains the same whoever owns it;
it's just as possible that the TM details are fake; and surely it is not within a
court's jurisdiction to overturn Afilias's contractual rules regarding the administration
of the .info roll-out.
I really don't see WIPO should be told by Michael Palage
to terminate what looks like a perfectly good challenge, and I really don't see why
one person gets to transfer his high-value domain name, in breach of the 180-day
rule, just because he is taken to court by himself, or an associate in the same office
suite as himself, or whatever the case may be here.
What jurisdiction does the
Maricopa Court of Arizona have over the running of a Registry based elsewhere?