Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: richard04
Date/Time: Thu, March 14, 2002 at 7:03 PM GMT
Browser: Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.0 using Windows 98
Score: 5
Subject: ICANN reject public elections to its Board as "invalid" and "unrepresentative"

Message:
 

 
From ICANN WATCH:

The ICANN Board has formally rejected the possibility of further elections for At-Large directors. In a resolution adopted Thursday morning (Ghana time), the Board stated that it had concerns about "the fairness, representativeness, validity and affordability of global online elections," and concluded that elections were not "the best means of achieving meaningful public representation or the informed participation of Internet users in the ICANN process." The Board thus rejected the key recommendation of its blue-ribbon At Large Study Committee. It indicated that while it "appreciated" the committee's work, the committee's minimalist call for a limited, scaled-back version of elections was still, well, unacceptable.

* * * * * * *

The internet community is more likely to have concerns about "the fairness, representativeness, validity and affordability of ICANN and its Board... given their apparent desire to sideline public involvement, public accountability, and consumer concerns.

When they say that elections were not "the best means of achieving meaningful public representation" what they mean by "meaningful public representation" is actually some facade of public involvement which allows ICANN to pursue its own agenda, maintain its opaque transparency, and evade all real dialogue and openness with the internet community at large.

The way in which Stuart Lynn decribed this forum (ICANN's own forum) as "a joke" more or less sums up what ICANN thinks of public participation.

It doesn't want awkward questions, and when awkward questions are asked, it just closes down and refuses to engage in any dialogue at all.

Everyone knows this from the records of this forum over recent months.

ICANN has failed to protect the consumer. Consumers lost millions of dollars, for example, in the .info Sunrise scam "abomination" (quote: Afilias director who resigned)...

ICANN continues to accredit, recommend and advertise Registrars who have been shown to act in a fraudulent way, and the consumer is left to perish.

No wonder ICANN does not want real public accountability. The public are an awkward and inconvenient part of their equation.     
     

 


Message Thread: