Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: richard04
Date/Time: Sun, March 17, 2002 at 1:40 PM GMT
Browser: Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.0 using Windows 98
Score: 5
Subject: Afilias : they were told in advance


As an example of the honesty and information generated by this forum, take another look at this message from "crs" posted on July 3rd, identifying a registrar who was promoting Sunrise fraud, informing Afilias, and requesting that such falsehoods be eradicated before the Landrush round-robin. In classic Afilias fashion, they never replied to him:

July 3rd 2001 from "crs"

Afilias says the sunrise period is for trademark holders only. But there is a Tucows register who says it is optional. I have mailed to them but no reply, are they deliberately trying to ruin the .info rollout?

I don't see any good names going to cheats in the sunrise with invalid trademark claims - in particular, registrars enom and dotster with their auction system surely wouldn't allow this.

Will Afilias ensure that invalid claims are overturned in time for the round-robin, if not then they clearly have no interest in ensuring a fair rollout process. I mailed Afilias also with no reply.



Link: Afilias were warned but did nothing

Message Thread:

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy