Return to newtlds Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: rs79
Date/Time: Sun, June 18, 2000 at 1:05 AM GMT (Sat, June 17, 2000 at 8:05 PM EST)
Browser: Netscape Communicator V4.6 using Windows 98
Score: 5
Subject: Bogus

Message:
 

       
      Q2: What stability concerns are associated with the initial phases of registration within the TLD?
      The purchaise of domain names for speculative reasons can reduce the usefulness of a new domain, and add an unnessicary cost of ownership for those that will make actual use of the name.

-----
This does not adress "stability" it speaks to the economics of the
situation.


      Q3: What can be done to eliminate or reduce these stability concerns?
      If the TLD is to be in high demand, a 2 month bidding period for all names in that namespace may prevent "domain squatting" and domain ownership speculation.  The bidding process would reveal the true value of the domain, and the extra money paid for popular domains could subsidise the TLD service instead.

-----

This would make the tld operator rich and nobody else. At least
if the domain is speculated on multiple people get rich. Neither
are desirable really but the latter is the lessor of two evils.


      Q4: Would these stability concerns be magnified by introducing a large number of TLDs at once?
      Possibly.  I cannot see any benifit in doing this, so I would advise against it.
-----

Absolutly not. Recognozing or creating a small number of tlds has two bad side effects: 1) it will create - makr my words - an utter feeding frenzy the likes of which have never been seen. All the good names will be gone in a few days and will almost ceratinly crash every system involved. Remember Cantor and Siegel? 2) By creating a small
number of tlds people who think they have to get their name in every possible tld will be able to easiy do so whereas if there are many
new tlds (as there will one day be - this is inevitable) they will
recognize the futility of this sooner than later. This is a good thing.

      Q5: Are there any practical means of reversing the introduction of a significant new TLD once it goes into operation?
      No.  This must not be done.  At best, prevent the introduction of new names in that TLD.
----

Agreed it can't be done (notwithstanding the fact that .oz and .nato
have been deleted)

Why would you want to delete a TLD? What possible justification could
there be for that?

     
     

--
The probability of human error in a complex system is a constant.


Message Thread:


Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy