Return to newtlds Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: AIM
Date/Time: Tue, June 20, 2000 at 1:46 PM GMT
Browser: Microsoft Internet Explorer V4.01 using Windows 98
Score: 5
Subject: The questions - set 9

Message:
 

 
       
      Q49: Does the schedule allow sufficient time for formulation of proposals?
The critical path is the call for proposals and the basis on which ICANN will evaluate these. This needs careful drafting. Give it another 30 days.

Q50: Does the schedule allow sufficient time for public comment?
Yes.

Q51: Should all proposals be posted for comment simultaneously to maintain equal time for public comment? Should all proposals be posted for public comment as they are received to allow the greatest possible time for public analysis and comment?
Public comment should be solicited for the basic ideas and proposals. More detailed comment on technicalities could be done separately.

Q52: Should the formal applications be posted in full for public comment? If not, which parts of the applications should remain private?
ICANN should write guidelines for applications based on the 6 WG C principles. This should be public.
An application will demonstrate how it conforms to the guidelines. This should be public.
ICANN's agreement or rejection to the conformity should also be public.


 


Message Thread:


Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy