Return to newtlds Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: Dennis
Date/Time: Tue, July 4, 2000 at 7:01 PM GMT
Browser: Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows NT 5.0
Score: 5
Subject: Questions 41-42:  More IP Protection Needed?

Message:
 

        ICANN's UDRP, while an improvement over NSI's dispute policy, is still weighted heavily against individuals and small businesses.  It goes significantly beyond the tests of trademark infringement applied by US courts, and as such (IMHO) violates both the White Paper and the MoU. 

If the UDRP were not protection enough, Congress obliged big business with the 1999 Anticybersquatting Act, which permits trademark holders to seek damages for acts of trademark dilution via a domain name.

It is very hard to see how the introduction of a new TLD can pose some sort of threat to the sanctity of intellectual property.

The more salient question is "Should ICANN be doing more to protect individual free speech and due process?"
     

Dennis Schaefer
Marblehead MA USA


Message Thread:


Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy