My organization which is not an NGO or registered non-profit
corporation obtained
a domain name with the purpose of establishing
an identity. Links are a
web identity.
If there is sufficient interest in a non-governmental organization
TLD,
then .ngo would make better sense than "stealing" .org from
non-commercial enterprises
who, in good faith, obtained domain names
for in-perpetuity purposes.
A real
question is: what at all does changing the definition of .org
have to do with
the re-negotiation of the Verisign contract?
It is weird things like this that
make the sheep^H^H^H^H^Hdomain
owners nervous.
raver dave reggaescientist.org