1. You have misrepresented the "original intention". What is beyond dispute
is as follows:a. .org was originally intended to be for organizations (hence the
name);
b. commercial entities were intended to go in .com (hence the name).
So
the undisputed "original definition" of .org is: a catchall TLD for non-commercial
organizations.
Moreover, this entire discussion is more or less nonsense.
The fact is that mention of "non-profit" organizations only occurs in discussion
papers; none of the formal documents mention it; and moreover, Joe Sims, on the Names
Council list, quite clearly states that no policy changes would be made without extensive
public debate. (See http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc04/msg00901.html.)
.org would be transferred to a new owner only after a long and exhaustive public
discussion had taken place on any policy issues.