Return to Proposed Revisions to NSI Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: tomodog
Date/Time: Mon, March 12, 2001 at 3:44 AM GMT
Browser: Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.0 using Windows 98
Score: 5
Subject: Verisign Holds a Public Trust - Not a Private Label

Message:
 

 
Bad idea to hand this domain over to Non Profit Organizations (NPOs)exclusively.  NSI has given out these DOT.ORGs without qualification for years.  Real NPOs needing to displace 'squatters' have a system in place to deal with it.  But the reverse is not true.  Legitimate holders of ORG domains have no alternate places to go in many cases.  This is a heavy handed opt-out of the civil responsibilities ICANN has with the obvious objective of fattening someone's wallet.  I don't think the Government's intent with privatizing the process was to make it a profit center for privately held corporations.  I believe it was to relieve the taxpayer of the burden of paying to sustain these public systems.  See the US Postal Service for an example of a public trust that has been (some might say successfully) turned over to private industry without harming the public interest.  The DOT.PRO domain is a sell-out since the public no longer has any input to how that domain is doled out.  The holder of the right to distribute them has unilaterally generated a list of eligible 'professionals' who may hold a DOT.PRO.  Others need not apply...  Are you a professional?  Do you do proefessional work?  Are you on the list?
 

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy