Thak you Gary seems at least some people can see some of the light but there are
some entities out there that will try to get this passed and that may be why it's
brought up in the first place.
When there were three main Dot exstentions that
ment there could be three entities out there with the same domain. Dot Coms
gain to venture by eliminating one third of thier compition this way.
I work for
a Non-profit organization and I can tell you that Non-profits stand to gain by creating
a single identity.
Problem is by doing so your eliminating compitition......
Other esteemed multimillion-dollor industries print out millions of
dollors worth of propaganda to ensure thier continued success.
Problem is is that
it is all one sided (I won't go into detail of those business but we know who they
I think we all need to get together (those dot orgs that happen to make a
profit) and be ready.
I am wanting my opportunity to work hard in life and be successful.
should not have it ripped away by propaganda and special intrest organizations.
I do not want any NPO's to think that I only see my side remember I work for one
and see thier value. However NPO's (by in large) either are produced by a profitable
company or organization or are out there by the need of the service.
should attempt to find ways to solve the problem not just shove it down under the
rug by passing a stipulation.
I like the NPO suggestion or either make an extension
for us that have profit organizations (PRO) possibly and offer it to .org companies.
could see somone having company.pro to replace thier company.org site.
It was not my mistake that I purchased a name that was intended for non-profit it
was the good folks that designed the system and they should accept some of the responsibility.
Make availible information and not just sell exstentions.