With only 2 days left
before ICANN's vote on proposed new NSI contracts the Internet focus remains on blurred
details of healthy competition and the fate of dot-orgs.I ask a fundamental question,
"Is NSI, the gTLD Registry/Registrar, guilty of domain name hoarding?"
These monumental
charges are before the courts and remain unsettled.
Info can be found here: http://www.domainduck.com/html/nonsi/html/nonsiabout.htm
On
March 27, 2001 I researched 'one' prefix - I searched all 'On-Hold' domain names
that began with 'SEXY'.
Here are the most suspicious:
Domain Name:
Registered On:
Expired On:
SexyPicture.com
05-Jul-1998
05-Jul-2000
SexySchoolGirl.com
12-Nov-1998
12-Nov-2000
SexyPlaza.com
30-Sep-1998
30-Sep-2000
SexyAudio.com
08-Nov-1998
08-Nov-2000
SexyList.com
03-Jul-1998
03-Jul-2000
SexySexy.com
09-Oct-1998
09-Oct-2000
SexyTheater.com
29-Sep-1997
30-Sep-2000
SexyThongs.com
03-Jul-1998
03-Jul-2000
SexySlips.com
12-Oct-1998
12-Oct-2000
SexyStyles.com
11-Nov-1998
11-Nov-2000
I
ask NSI and ICANN, NICs and Registrars and Brokers, Small and Large business, the
MEDIA who continues to ignore this issue, and all gTLD domain registrants: WHY ARE
THESE DOMAIN NAMES NOT AVAILABLE TO EVERYONE RIGHT NOW?
Does NSI 'Own' expired
Domain Names? Does NSI 'Own' the gTLD Database?
Because of NSI's policies, I have
lost my family domain name, Griffin.com. It can happen to you.
Info can be found
here: http://www.domainduck.com/html/nonsi/html/nonsiabout.htm
I ask another fundamental
question, "Can an apple tree produce oranges?"
Tim Griffin