[Date Prev]
[Date Next]
[Thread Prev]
[Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: [ga] Who speaks for the ALAC?
|
- To: "Jeff Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,<dannyyounger@xxxxxx>,<forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: [ga] Who speaks for the ALAC?
- From: "Ron Sherwood" <sherwood@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 06:29:39 -0700
- Cc: <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,<vb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,<richardhenderson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,<ga@xxxxxxxx>,"atlarge discuss list" <atlarge-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Importance: Normal
- References: <1ea.9f20f46.2c0ad0ff@cs.com> <3ED9BFA3.EF247ED8@ix.netcom.com>
Good morning, Jeff:
You wrote:
> Listed below you will note an approximate word count of the contributions
of
> each ALAC member to the ALAC discussion list last month.
>
> 0 -- Pierre Dandjinou
> 0 -- Clement Dzidonu
> 0 -- Izumi Aizu
> 0 -- Esther Dyson
> 6 -- Sebastián J. Ricciardi
> 400 -- Xue Hong
> 700 -- Erick Iriarte Ahon
> 1800 -- Vittorio Bertola
> 2550 -- Thomas Roessler
> 4000 -- Wendy Seltzer
>
> Draw your own conclusions.
Sometimes you do open peoples eyes!
Ron Sherwood
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Williams" <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
To: <dannyyounger@cs.com>; <forum@alac.icann.org>
Cc: <karl@CaveBear.com>; <vb@bertola.eu.org>;
<richardhenderson@ntlworld.com>; <ga@dnso.org>; "atlarge discuss list"
<atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 4:56 AM
Subject: [atlarge-discuss] Re: [ga] Who speaks for the ALAC?
> Danny and all former DNSO GA members or other interested parties,
>
> I cannot really draw any conclusion from your post here as it relates
> to the subject line, Danny. I am sure that there is a point that you
> are attempting to make, however.
>
> In any event, the better or more appropriate question as a subject
> line might be "Who as stakeholders/users does the ALAC believe
> they speak for?" From their web pages, it would seem that they
> purport to speak for all stakeholders/users and the ONLY
> "Atlarge" user representation ICANN excepts or respects.
> Yet the ALAC has no individual stakeholder/user members
> nor allows for such. Seems to be a very disjointed concept
> and assertion as others have expressed in various
> ways recently. But that's ICANN for ya! http://alac.icann.org/
>
> DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
>
> > Listed below you will note an approximate word count of the
contributions of
> > each ALAC member to the ALAC discussion list last month.
> >
> > 0 -- Pierre Dandjinou
> > 0 -- Clement Dzidonu
> > 0 -- Izumi Aizu
> > 0 -- Esther Dyson
> > 6 -- Sebastián J. Ricciardi
> > 400 -- Xue Hong
> > 700 -- Erick Iriarte Ahon
> > 1800 -- Vittorio Bertola
> > 2550 -- Thomas Roessler
> > 4000 -- Wendy Seltzer
> >
> > Draw your own conclusions.
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> Regards,
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 131k members/stakeholders strong!)
> "Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
> Pierre Abelard
> ================================================================
> CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
> Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>
[Date Prev]
[Date Next]
[Thread Prev]
[Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
|