Return to .org Reassignment Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: DotOrg Foundation
Date/Time: Thu, August 22, 2002 at 7:12 AM GMT
Browser: Microsoft Internet Explorer V6.0 using Windows NT 5.1
Score: 5
Subject: Explain why voluntary validation of noncommercial entities elicited a "strongly negative" response


We do not understand why the validation concept elicited a "strongly negative" response among some of the reviewers.  Can you please explain more clearly why voluntary (optional) validation of a noncommercial registrant's credentials, which would be posted in an accessible, transparent manner would be seen as undermining the DotOrg Foundation in the "differentiation" criterion?


Message Thread:

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy