Return to .org Reassignment Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	DotOrg Foundation
Date/Time:	Thu, August 22, 2002 at 7:16 AM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V6.0 using Windows NT 5.1
Score:	5
Subject:	Why a zero score on geographic diversity when most of our supporting organizations are International
Message:
Why doesn't the table on page 43 give us more than a zero score on geographic diversity when most of our supporting organizations (CanadaHelps, Habitat Canada, Independent Sector, AFP) are all International organizations.

Message Thread:

• DotOrg Foundation Questions for NCDNHC regarding Evaluation Report — DotOrg Foundation, August 22 @ 7:04 AM (5/6)
• Why a zero score on geographic diversity when most of our supporting organizations are International — DotOrg Foundation, August 22 @ 7:16 AM (0/0)
• No listing in addendum regarding supporters (page 36) — DotOrg Foundation, August 22 @ 7:14 AM (0/0)
• How did you distinguish our support letters — DotOrg Foundation, August 22 @ 7:13 AM (1/1)
• Clarification of eGrants.org intention — iammstein, August 22 @ 10:15 PM (0/0)
• Explain why voluntary validation of noncommercial entities elicited a "strongly negative" response — DotOrg Foundation, August 22 @ 7:12 AM (0/0)
• Formulas for normalized rankings — DotOrg Foundation, August 22 @ 7:09 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy