Return to self-nomination Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: Steven Hill
Date/Time: Thu, June 29, 2000 at 8:46 AM GMT
Browser: Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows 98
Score: 5
Subject: comments on proposed rules for self-nomination

Message:
 

 
       
1) the 10 percent threshold for self nomination is way too high.
Particularly when combined with the fact that ICANN will not give out email addresses of those people who support you need to self nominate!  Think about it, it's like trying to do a voter initiative, but you aren't allowed to go out on the street and collect signatures, instead you have to sit at your house and wait for people to come to you.  That's hardly a reasonable method for self-nomination.

2) given the high threshold for self-nomination, and the real possibility that no one will qualify by self-nomination, it's really important that the Nominating Committee be required to nominate several candidates.  Otherwise, we could easily end up with no elections at all, just appointments.

3) members should be able to nominate more than one candidate.  Otherwise, the self-nomination process is really a primary election.  Except there is no campaigning allowed, candidates have to "wait at home" for voters to visit them, and attract 10 percent support from voters with one vote, based on a simple statement as their only form of familiarity with the candidates. that sounds like a formula for a lot of frustration and disappointment.

all best,

Steven Hill
Center for Voting and Democracy


 


Message Thread:


Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy