Return to tldreport Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: lapointe
Date/Time: Sat, November 11, 2000 at 3:00 AM GMT
Browser: Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Score: 5
Subject: ICANN and staff did well

Message:
 

 
We can all say we saw a fair and unbiased "trimming" of the list of applicants.  I was particularly pleased to see IOD, Diebold and SRI as highly considered applicants. 

However, a few notes on each:

IOD
Could IOD adjust its pricing structure (would ICANN allow this at this point)?  This seems to be the only salient negative issue brought up in the review.

Diebold
A well thought approach like theirs must have a well though business and financial approach behind it.  ICANN, can you get Diebold to furnish some of this information at this point?  There must be some way for them to post some of this information.

SRI
Can you broaden the potential applications for your model?  Your view of how this approach might apply to other areas of use would be helpful.

ICANN, will you allow the applicants to respond to the observations?

Martin
 


Message Thread:


Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy