Return to tldreport Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: jeffrey
Date/Time: Mon, November 13, 2000 at 4:25 PM GMT
Browser: Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.0 using Windows 98
Score: 5
Subject: Pioneers in an alternate root

Message:
 

 
Given the short amount of time that ICANN gave to applicants to prepare their proposals and the minimal amount of solicitation for the proposals, I must conclude that ICANN has already exhibited some preference for pioneers. With more time and perhaps a small amount of advertising, they could've generated more new corporate interest in new TLDs (generic and otherwise) that would've led to more applications. Given the current popularity of .web, it seems reasonable to assume that some potential applicants were dissuaded from risking $50,000 for .web.  In my opinion most potential applicants who chose not to apply for .web did so more because of concern regarding IODs pioneering efforts than because of strong competition from companies such as Afilias or Neustar possibly being in the mix.  Still other potential applicants were simply unaware of what was going on.

So what's wrong with trying to establish a new TLD in an alternate root system? Isn't that a nice testing ground for new TLDs?  That’s being a pioneer. Wouldn't it be reasonable for investors/registrants to sink their money into a new tld (such as .KIDS) in an alternate root system as a proof of concept?  No fraud, just speculation. Wouldn't it be fair to have multiple different registries competing for investors /registrants using the same TLD?  Wouldn’t it be fair to then choose a registry active in the alternate root and accept the registrants along with the registry that proves to be the winner? The only preferential treatment afforded to the registrants with the losing registry is the possibility that an alternate TLD is needed.  In that (unlikely) case you might accept the registrants with the alternate registry.  What's not fair about that?  The investors/registrants take risks, but they are rewarded if their registry is chosen.  Investors/registrants who want to spread their risk around might register with several “pre” registries. These “pre” registries could compete with their offers to entice investors/registrants. This model seems very ordinary to me.  What is the purpose of having some sort of mad rush at an artificially created starting line? Without these pre-registrations you must necessarily impose a democratic system where some are more equal than others.

     
 


Message Thread:


Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy