Return to tldreport Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	sunshine
Date/Time:	Mon, November 13, 2000 at 11:46 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows 95
Score:	5
Subject:	case in point
Message:
>>>IOD is lambasted for not having a second office; the Afilias address is not its own, but is within a highly-prestigious New York legal firm. IOD’s ability to handle a large influx is questioned, despite its well-functioning database; Afilias is praised despite its having no database. IOD earns negative points for not having a large enough body of personnel; Afilias has no clear personnel at all.<<< Your points above summarize some of the reasons for the violation of the following Bylaw: Bylaws Amended Bylaws July 16, 2000 (c) The Corporation shall not apply its standards, policies, procedures or practices inequitably or single out any particular party for disparate treatment unless justified by substantial and reasonable cause, such as the promotion of effective competition. --M Lynn

Message Thread:

• Questionable application evaluation — mediaevum, November 13 @ 10:20 PM (2/3)
• case in point — sunshine, November 13 @ 11:46 PM (0/0)
• IOD — newtld, November 13 @ 11:07 PM (1/1)
• Yes — HarryA, November 14 @ 1:21 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy