I found this post to be interesting. Firstly, it is clearly self-serving in some
way. Secondly, it fails to support itself with logic.For example, the statement
that "The new TLD .biz is sure to be most popular" is clearly in error. Personally,
I think .xxx will be the most popular. That said, there is no certainty in this premise.
The
obvious conclusion given the premise appears to be, "and should be granted to a company
with experience in the industry," which is also erroneous. Clearly, a popular TLD
should be given to the most qualified applicant nad one indicator of qualification
is experience. A simple example of this would be to point out all the experienced
individuals who are unlikely to be chosen (Dan Quayle for president, Phyllis Diller
as a wife, and so forth).
Then the final statement, "Abacus America meets this
requirement." is added to the overall argument. Firstly, it meets the requirement
of experience, How? Secondly, so what?
I read the post and was lost to the purpose
of such a post. Perhaps reworded in a less agressive and illogical fashion the statement
would make sense.
Gordon