<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[wildcard-comments] Verisign DNS abuse
- To: wildcard-comments@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [wildcard-comments] Verisign DNS abuse
- From: Tuomo Latto<djv@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
- Sender: owner-wildcard-comments@xxxxxxxxx
1. I like to _immediately_ see if there's no server on the other end when I'm
surfing. VeriSign's SiteFinder prevents this. 2. Terms of service are
reported on the SiteFinder. Since my "use" of the "service" is
_involuntarily_, I find _any_ such terms unacceptable. 3. VeriSign should
pay me for the bandwidth they waste. 4. SiteFinder makes it impossible to
find out whether a domain name really exists when using only DNS!! 5.
Section 4.1.1. (Header section format) of RFC1035 part of STD 0013 states:
"RCODE Response code - this 4 bit field is set as part of responses.
The values have the following interpretation:" ... "3 Name Error
- Meaningful only for responses from an authoritative name server,
this code signifies that the domain name referenced in the query
does not exist." So, VeriSign's DNS servers are NON-STANDARD as they DO NOT
respond with RCODE 3 to queries of inexistent domain names!!!
I have signed and I agree with the petition at http://www.whois.sc/verisign-dns/
- Tuomo Latto
Helsinki, Finland
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|