ICANN Public Comment Forum | VGRS Proposal for a Wait-Listing Service

This Comment Forum is now closed.

ICANN Public Comment Forum

VGRS Proposal for a Wait-Listing Service

One of the topics to be considered at the ICANN meeting to be held in Bucharest, Romania, from 24-28 June 2002 is a proposal by VeriSign Global Registry
Services to establish, on a twelve-month trial basis, a "Wait-Listing Service" (WLS) for the .com and .net top-level domains. A detailed topic paper on the proposal has been prepared and posted to prompt discussion. This web-based forum has been established to receive comments from the community.

To post a message in this forum, you must first register. You need only register once — your username and password will work on all ICANN public comment forums.

Comments through Friday, 23 August 2002

Looks like WLS is going to be approved, grrrr! — GeorgeK, 1:07 AM (1/1)

We need to conact our congressmen and senators! — ljprevo, 1:37 AM (0/0)

Aug 18th drop shows that their is NO need for WLS — dmw, Thu 5:42 AM (1/2)

Nicely said, but.... — GeorgeK, Thu 6:24 AM (1/1)

You are right! — dmw, Thu 7:48 AM (0/0)

WLS proposal — BDS1, Tue 10:45 PM (0/0)

The Domain Industry Should Be Open And Free — william_dw, August 14 @ 5:42 AM (0/0)

Open Fair and Free — WillyMore, August 11 @ 10:33 AM (0/0)

Aganist Verisign/NetSol monopoly - money for work - not for monopoly! — alx27, August 7 @ 9:19 AM (0/0)

MONOPOLY Is A BAD Idea! - FAIR Redistribution Thoughts — radioz, August 7 @ 7:42 AM (0/0)

FTC Probing Verisign!! — GeorgeK, August 7 @ 4:19 AM (1/1)

Yahoo issues a minor correction — dotfnord, August 7 @ 4:43 AM (0/0)

Ever wonder whats going to happen when people can't afford a domain? — thehostworks, August 1 @ 5:06 PM (0/0)

WLS- Versign fiasco — jkone, July 31 @ 10:41 PM (0/0)

WLS opposition — wolfofaz, July 31 @ 8:14 PM (0/0)

WLS — dnsresearch, July 30 @ 2:57 AM (0/0)

Verisign — jcfreeman, July 28 @ 11:00 AM (0/0)

Can ICANN afford to be had? — digitalsandy, July 27 @ 1:24 AM (0/0)

Scope of Board consideration of WLS — SusanCrawford, July 26 @ 11:42 PM (2/2)

Returning the recommendation to the DNSO — DLY, July 27 @ 10:48 AM (0/0)
We've heard these before....broken record from WLS proponents? — GeorgeK, July 27 @ 7:05 AM (0/0)

Verisign — Neather, July 26 @ 10:33 PM (0/0)

bad idea — lisadudley, July 26 @ 6:13 PM (1/2)

I AGREE that this monopoly is a BAD IDEA — boatsafloat, July 27 @ 12:17 AM (1/1)

I AGREE — carre, August 9 @ 9:52 PM (0/0)

Oppose the Verisign Partnership — marylandemu.com, July 26 @ 5:42 AM (0/0)

Verisgn smells suspicious — tomsanderson, July 25 @ 9:54 PM (0/0)

Demanding high ransoms for domain names — guy52, July 25 @ 9:52 PM (0/0)

Verisign — sam80437, July 25 @ 1:46 AM (0/0)

Verisign's Sleazy, Deceptive Marketing Practices — GordSears, July 25 @ 1:25 AM (0/0)

WLS is dead (or should be): Names Council vote comments — GeorgeK, July 24 @ 8:48 PM (0/0)

Quoth the Tuco -- Nevermore! — Tuco2, July 24 @ 7:13 PM (0/0)

My Verign saga... — BethC, July 24 @ 9:36 AM (1/1)

Duplicate Charge to Credit Card — DonBrown, July 25 @ 6:18 PM (0/0)

WLS — schampeo, July 24 @ 6:15 AM (0/0)

It is anti-democratic — Randy CA, July 23 @ 6:44 PM (0/0)

Preposterous. — Jasonir, July 23 @ 5:09 PM (0/0)

Is Icann Blind? Pleae not again! — ellokn, July 23 @ 4:04 PM (0/0)

No to wls — mfarlow, July 23 @ 2:06 PM (0/0)

opose this crap (WLS) — clearmark, July 23 @ 10:57 AM (0/0)

Clearly, the only beneficiary here is Verisign — LtlPhysics, July 23 @ 10:42 AM (0/0)

WLS is contrary to Intellectual Property Laws — jrp, July 23 @ 5:28 AM (1/1)

Hey Vinny... The Outfit Speaks! — MEO, July 23 @ 8:05 AM (0/0)

I have to say no...this isn't a good idea. — Todd S., July 23 @ 5:16 AM (0/0)

MONOPOLY IS UNDERSTATED: ABSOLUTE CONTROL IS WHAT VERISIGN WANTS — play, July 23 @ 12:52 AM (0/0)

petition... — jandeusa, July 22 @ 11:53 PM (0/0)

VeriSign — vwlp, July 22 @ 9:15 PM (0/0)

Approximately 3000 signatures on Anti-WLS petition — GeorgeK, July 22 @ 9:12 PM (0/0)

W.L.S.- Let's get Ennron and Worldcom directors to run this — kneelsit, July 22 @ 6:48 PM (0/0)

Opposed to WLS - Verisign already holding Domain hostage — NatureAli, July 22 @ 6:09 PM (1/1)

Don't pay the Invoice! — MEO, July 23 @ 6:34 AM (0/0)

Don't let this happen... — Blue, July 22 @ 5:41 PM (0/0)

I4m in total disagreement with VeriSigns proposal!!!!! — ehvar, July 22 @ 5:23 PM (0/0)

NO to WLS from home user — Kismet, July 22 @ 10:06 AM (0/0)

Respect the international community and also prevent the domain market to be one-sided — miloman, July 22 @ 7:41 AM (0/0)

Come on ICANN - do your job properly. — markcastle, July 22 @ 3:19 AM (0/0)

Internet, not Monopoly — instart, July 22 @ 12:11 AM (0/0)

WLS — HH12345, July 21 @ 8:10 PM (0/0)

Why reastablish a monopoly we finally broke (to the consumers' great benefit)? — VirtCert.com, July 21 @ 6:28 PM (0/0)

WLS offers no benefits to anyone other than Verisign — MNelson, July 21 @ 5:59 PM (1/1)

Seizures are NOT a good idea! — MEO, July 22 @ 8:01 AM (0/0)

WLS is absurd and transparent — kweis7, July 21 @ 5:08 PM (0/0)

wls creation — davidreynold, July 21 @ 8:14 AM (0/0)

WLS Creation — jfadiam, July 21 @ 7:38 AM (0/0)

VeriSign ruined Thawte — jsbuchanan, July 20 @ 10:29 PM (0/0)

Verisign Fraud — Clint Gray, July 20 @ 9:08 PM (0/0)

Please reject this proposal — boiseweb, July 20 @ 8:06 PM (0/0)

I agree WLS and ICANN are jokes — ChrisLucas, July 20 @ 6:52 PM (0/0)

Is WLS a joke? — emkay, July 20 @ 6:11 PM (0/0)

ICANN - Leave It Alone. — pulchrum, July 20 @ 5:38 PM (0/0)

No-more messing around with expiring names — edenia, July 20 @ 2:57 PM (0/0)

Information Superhighway becomes the Disinformation Boulevard — swan, July 20 @ 2:55 PM (0/0)

Mopoly should Remain a board game (WLS) — towerrat79, July 20 @ 10:39 AM (1/1)

which registrars do charity works ? — dotstersucks, July 20 @ 11:05 AM (0/0)

ICANN/WLS — dsslaw, July 20 @ 2:17 AM (1/2)

Not Anti-Trust ... it's Anti-Rust! — MEO, July 20 @ 8:57 AM (1/1)

Why didn't ICANN bar non-Americans from this domain game ? — dotstersucks, July 20 @ 11:01 AM (0/0)

WLS Illegal Lottery? — mcwebber, July 20 @ 2:12 AM (0/0)

WLS is bas even if Dotstersucks — swvincent, July 20 @ 1:52 AM (0/0)

Oppose WLS — ervkr, July 20 @ 1:36 AM (0/0)

FOR WLS — 4WLS, July 20 @ 12:29 AM (2/2)

100% of what? Dreams? — MEO, July 20 @ 9:50 AM (0/0)
A kettle calls a pot black story — dotstersucks, July 20 @ 1:06 AM (0/0)

Disagree with Verisign — mrprada, July 20 @ 12:21 AM (0/0)

WLS - More power to the big guys!? — ddunlop, July 19 @ 10:44 PM (0/0)

Don't play Monopoly — instart, July 19 @ 10:31 PM (0/0)

wls — otronline, July 19 @ 9:02 PM (0/0)

Yet another monopoly? — hafeliel, July 19 @ 8:38 PM (0/0)

Verisign cannot and should not collude to close the domain name market — verlin, July 19 @ 8:37 PM (1/1)

Oh, but collusion makes this better! — MEO, July 22 @ 8:09 AM (0/0)

WLS spells Bad News for Little Developers! — cassars, July 19 @ 8:31 PM (0/0)

THIS IS WHAT YOU WANT TO DO — bennoart, July 19 @ 8:28 PM (1/4)

a crime is crime — dotstersucks, July 20 @ 1:15 AM (1/3)

Business as "Crime." Duh??!!! — MEO, July 20 @ 8:48 AM (1/2)

Enron and Worldcom also in business..cool man — dotstersucks, July 20 @ 11:18 AM (1/1)

Ever hear of the drop pool? — MEO, July 20 @ 10:01 PM (0/0)

VeriSign WLS — brainey, July 19 @ 8:27 PM (0/0)

Another Vote AGAINST Verisign's WLS Proposal — tektreve, July 19 @ 8:20 PM (0/0)

WLS — drlemonde, July 19 @ 8:14 PM (0/0)

VOTE NO TO Verisign & WLS!!!!!!!! — BeyondDomains, July 19 @ 8:08 PM (0/0)

Keep the system free, and logical — markster, July 19 @ 6:37 PM (0/0)

VeriSign NO GOOD — Fireflynj, July 19 @ 6:21 PM (0/0)

No to WLS and VeriSign. Period...... — Canyon, July 19 @ 6:04 PM (0/0)

Verisign Monopoly — BruceSherman, July 19 @ 5:59 PM (0/0)

WLS is a retrograde step — thadyquill, July 19 @ 3:55 PM (0/0)

Look back: These are just the LATEST Rants! — MEO, July 19 @ 3:25 PM (0/0)

No on Wait-Listing Proposal — wendyb, July 19 @ 11:24 AM (0/0)

Undermining competition — sidkdbl07, July 19 @ 9:44 AM (0/0)

NO MORE MONOPOLY — JoeD, July 19 @ 7:13 AM (0/0)

Downright Disgusting! — pixelchyk, July 19 @ 7:13 AM (0/0)

Just say no to VeriSign and monopolies — connorw, July 19 @ 6:36 AM (0/0)

No, no, no! No WLS! — pbabcock, July 19 @ 5:17 AM (0/0)

2 more Drops to Dotster — bennoart, July 19 @ 4:10 AM (1/4)

How they did it? — dotstersucks, July 19 @ 6:28 AM (1/3)

The Old Fashion Way. They.... — MEO, July 19 @ 3:39 PM (1/2)

Sorry...that is good for speculators only — dotstersucks, July 20 @ 12:46 AM (1/1)

Then allow me to speculate! — MEO, July 20 @ 10:19 PM (0/0)

giving to them that's got — jeri, July 19 @ 3:48 AM (0/0)

Absolutely Not! — rocketrocks, July 19 @ 3:39 AM (0/0)

Open competition is the only way — cwilson, July 19 @ 2:40 AM (0/0)

VeriSign Bad!!! — jr213, July 19 @ 2:34 AM (0/0)

Anti WLS — gabe225, July 19 @ 2:18 AM (0/0)

Monopoly through the backdoor? No way! — TheBluntGuy, July 19 @ 1:51 AM (0/0)

VGRS Proposal for a Wait-Listing — adwizards, July 19 @ 1:02 AM (0/0)

Let them do it! — emladris, July 18 @ 11:10 PM (0/0)

Versign = dictatorship (but without the guts) — sharpnet2, July 18 @ 10:23 PM (0/0)

Domain Squatters — mfluder, July 18 @ 7:38 PM (0/0)

WLS — SnowHawk, July 18 @ 6:44 PM (0/0)

Verisign WLS proposal a Bad Idea — cvan, July 18 @ 6:27 PM (0/0)

Verisign/Snapnames proposal — mcardle, July 18 @ 5:38 PM (0/0)

We don't need a monopoly on expired domains. (No Text) — jpmasseo, July 18 @ 4:47 PM (0/0)

This is a bad idea — mschroebel, July 18 @ 4:46 PM (0/0)

WLS — cehjohnson, July 18 @ 2:31 PM (0/0)

Stop the monopoly! — tcscottc, July 18 @ 5:32 AM (0/0)

Help fight this monopoly! — soultree, July 18 @ 3:48 AM (0/0)

Verisign needs to go! We want choice! — Soccernmore, July 18 @ 3:06 AM (0/0)

Against WLS! — eric4479, July 17 @ 11:00 PM (0/0)

WLS — mancuso, July 17 @ 10:43 PM (1/2)

You shall challenge Verisign long time ago if you are a so-called anti monopoly person — dotstersucks, July 18 @ 2:06 PM (1/1)

Go easy on this guy. He's a Communist. — MEO, July 22 @ 8:44 AM (0/0)

3 Strikes, You're Out — pgram, July 17 @ 10:31 PM (0/0)

no to monopoly..save the Dotstores — achivaround, July 17 @ 9:57 PM (0/0)

VeriSign Sucks — bpuppy, July 17 @ 9:36 PM (1/1)

VeriSign sucks — psycle, July 18 @ 12:25 AM (0/0)

This is a terrible solution to a very minor issue. — jgmoore, July 17 @ 6:33 PM (0/0)

Please Resist Temptation to 'streamline' — dpro, July 17 @ 6:07 PM (0/0)

A registry for what is not yet in the real registry? — scaru, July 17 @ 3:36 PM (0/0)

Please - not another Monopoly — rentalsfrance, July 17 @ 11:48 AM (0/0)

Does anybody else see a problem here..... — UseCaution, July 17 @ 2:23 AM (0/0)

WLS — jmpreston, July 17 @ 1:49 AM (2/2)

you know what you are bashing? — dotstersucks, July 17 @ 11:07 AM (0/0)
well said! — UseCaution, July 17 @ 1:53 AM (0/0)

I don't trust SnapNames either. — UseCaution, July 17 @ 1:02 AM (0/0)

Do you know what WLS is? or do i? — RyanMF, July 17 @ 12:25 AM (1/7)

I do... I do... — jvoge1, July 17 @ 3:11 AM (2/6)

Great Overview! — MEO, July 19 @ 3:12 PM (0/0)
Any attempt to confuse innocents — dotstersucks, July 17 @ 10:56 AM (2/4)

Who are you Dotstersucks? — MEO, July 19 @ 2:56 PM (0/0)
I do... I do... — jvoge1, July 17 @ 7:39 PM (1/2)

Third option shall be there — dotstersucks, July 18 @ 1:42 PM (1/1)

First we have to stop WLS! — MEO, July 19 @ 3:20 PM (0/0)

New Policies — johnrachel, July 17 @ 12:01 AM (0/0)

Vote no — agaudio, July 16 @ 11:02 PM (1/1)

As long as my vote still counts... — NO, July 17 @ 9:27 AM (0/0)

preserve free trade - no to WLS — javt, July 16 @ 8:29 PM (0/0)

WLS — srsmitty, July 16 @ 8:06 PM (1/1)

To kill off WLS does not stop Versign monopoly in registry business — dotstersucks, July 16 @ 8:41 PM (0/0)

A vote *against* the WLS — paulmcnabb, July 16 @ 7:15 PM (1/1)

Another new system — dotstersucks, July 16 @ 8:22 PM (0/0)

WLS initiative — TaxMama, July 16 @ 6:16 PM (0/0)

Just Say NO! — kat, July 16 @ 5:52 PM (0/0)

WLS = the Speculators Best Friend — eyeondomain.com, July 16 @ 4:16 PM (2/2)

Money making machine... — freetrade, July 17 @ 12:17 AM (0/0)
The main issue is — dotstersucks, July 16 @ 6:00 PM (0/0)

WLS — wwasher, July 16 @ 4:06 PM (0/0)

WLS proposal is a step backwards ... — afriq, July 16 @ 3:52 PM (0/0)

Competition is Good — lbeiderbecke, July 16 @ 3:49 PM (2/3)

What kind of competition you are so proud? — dotstersucks, July 16 @ 5:55 PM (1/1)

Who do you work for DotsterSucks? — MEO, July 19 @ 2:46 PM (0/0)

I agree — afriq, July 16 @ 4:10 PM (0/0)

WLS is bad news for competition — brian719, July 16 @ 3:14 PM (0/0)

New version of ancient politics — parkstad, July 16 @ 11:16 AM (0/0)

DOTSTER = Amateur — verisign-sucks, July 16 @ 10:15 AM (0/0)

DOTSTER SERVICE SUCKS — verisign-sucks, July 16 @ 10:14 AM (0/0)

DOTSTER SUCKS, DON'T USE THEM — verisign-sucks, July 16 @ 10:13 AM (0/0)

Most of my domains registered at dotster are inaccessible... — verisign-sucks, July 16 @ 10:08 AM (0/0)

DOTSTER SUCKS — verisign-sucks, July 16 @ 10:02 AM (2/2)

If you have a specific complaint... — jandl, July 17 @ 3:13 PM (0/0)
Don't spam this WLS forum, please. — dotstersucks, July 16 @ 11:21 AM (0/0)

About DOTSTER, Inc. — verisign-sucks, July 16 @ 10:01 AM (2/6)

No need — hthrnnclrk, July 17 @ 3:19 AM (1/1)

free — verisign-sucks, August 2 @ 10:07 PM (0/0)

No reason to jump on one registrar — hthrnnclrk, July 17 @ 3:16 AM (2/3)

thiev — verisign-sucks, August 2 @ 10:09 PM (0/0)
inaccessible domains? — jr213, July 19 @ 2:50 AM (1/1)

shut up — verisign-sucks, August 2 @ 10:11 PM (0/0)

test — verisign-sucks, July 16 @ 9:53 AM (0/0)

VeriSign WLS — grayantimatter, July 16 @ 7:31 AM (1/3)

One side campaign from domain resellers to offtrack WLS — dotstersucks, July 16 @ 8:07 AM (1/2)

Dotster is an excellent registrar... — freetrade, July 16 @ 10:44 PM (1/1)

Too naive to believe another Enron alike business — dotstersucks, July 16 @ 11:59 PM (0/0)

No to Verisign — publisher, July 16 @ 5:11 AM (0/0)

Strongly opposes any monopoly — mad27307, July 16 @ 3:51 AM (0/0)

Deception = Profits for VGRS — shattered media, July 16 @ 3:25 AM (0/0)

Ridiculous — richlowe, July 16 @ 3:22 AM (0/0)

Strongly oppose WLS proposal — myaffee, July 16 @ 2:43 AM (0/0)

Verisign Proposal — roskosb, July 16 @ 2:15 AM (0/0)

VGRS - a Rapacious Monolopy — ChiefWebOfficer, July 16 @ 2:12 AM (0/0)

Oppose WLS — DonBrown, July 16 @ 12:51 AM (0/0)

WLS — Barry, July 16 @ 12:49 AM (0/0)

NO WLS! — apjjr, July 16 @ 12:37 AM (2/2)

first come, first served ??? — dotstersucks, July 16 @ 7:07 AM (0/0)
... — RyanMF, July 16 @ 12:53 AM (0/0)

No to WLS Monopoly — garisimo, July 16 @ 12:30 AM (0/0)

WLS...Yes? — RyanMF, July 16 @ 12:25 AM (1/4)

WLS... Yes? Are you nuts. Never vote for a tax! — apjjr, July 16 @ 12:45 AM (2/3)

Million of public members are NUTs, not cybersquatters if WLS is dropped — dotstersucks, July 16 @ 6:50 AM (0/0)
.... — RyanMF, July 16 @ 12:57 AM (1/1)

I never say that except domain wolfs — dotstersucks, July 16 @ 8:05 PM (0/0)

Wait Listing Service — billgraham, July 16 @ 12:19 AM (0/0)

anti-WLS — Quantum_Blast, July 16 @ 12:01 AM (0/0)

WLS - don't — thirolle, July 15 @ 10:29 PM (0/0)

WLS — TOMA, July 15 @ 10:17 PM (0/0)

WLS — kennyboy, July 15 @ 10:04 PM (0/0)

WLS — carollight, July 15 @ 9:40 PM (1/1)

Oppose the Verisgn Petition — Marty Cusack, July 15 @ 10:12 PM (0/0)

ICann Proposal — Inetekk, July 15 @ 9:37 PM (0/0)

Down with WLS — ggoswami, July 15 @ 9:19 PM (0/0)

Down with Verisign / Up with peoples choice — jonzy, July 15 @ 8:39 PM (0/0)

No to WLS — davideous, July 15 @ 8:30 PM (0/0)

Waiting List/Snapname/Verisign — SteveTackett, July 15 @ 8:28 PM (0/0)

Against WLS Proposal — vengeance, July 15 @ 7:39 PM (0/0)

VeriSign does not need any more power! Don't give it to them! — feelie75, July 15 @ 7:23 PM (0/0)

Against WLS — cquine, July 15 @ 7:18 PM (0/0)

The wls is against everything the internet stands for. — capitalj, July 15 @ 7:12 PM (0/0)

Verisign Proposal on Domain Name Wait Listing Service (WLS) — bill weaver, July 15 @ 6:48 PM (0/0)

Postel must be turning in his grave. — mynameismonkey, July 15 @ 6:36 PM (0/0)

monopolization is bad — dharmaduf, July 15 @ 6:35 PM (1/1)

Try register a great deleted domain from your current registrar — dotstersucks, July 15 @ 7:05 PM (0/0)

WLS — rbclark, July 15 @ 6:22 PM (0/0)

Preserve the ICANN — mdhailstone, July 15 @ 6:18 PM (0/0)

Opposed to Verisign WLS Proposal — Seneca, July 15 @ 5:38 PM (0/0)

Reject WLS Proposal — stripcony, July 15 @ 5:37 PM (0/0)

I'm against WLS! — DanHadaway, July 15 @ 5:31 PM (0/0)

waiting list — mdbpatriot, July 15 @ 5:30 PM (0/0)

20/20 should investigate Verisign — javago, July 15 @ 5:19 PM (1/1)

Amen brother. Well said. — UseCaution, July 17 @ 1:51 AM (0/0)

Verisign's WLS proposal — jdinz0817, July 15 @ 4:59 PM (0/0)

Any better alternative than WLS and current system? — dotstersucks, July 15 @ 4:53 PM (1/1)

Re: Any better alternative than WLS and current system? — jjscha, July 15 @ 10:28 PM (0/0)

No to WLS — bwrig, July 15 @ 4:31 PM (0/0)

In opposition of the Verisign WLS Proposal — sbarrett, July 15 @ 4:29 PM (0/0)

Just say No to WLS — fuerstma, July 15 @ 4:24 PM (0/0)

Wait-listing proposal from Verisign — Customer1, July 15 @ 4:14 PM (0/0)

ICANN should be Dissolved — cybergal, July 15 @ 3:15 PM (0/0)

It doesn't seem right — nicowens, July 15 @ 3:13 PM (0/0)

No to Verisign! — khouske, July 15 @ 2:17 PM (0/0)

WLS — RGapinski, July 15 @ 2:13 PM (0/0)

verisign proposal — paguru, July 15 @ 1:03 PM (0/0)

No to robbery by Verisign in broad daylight — ps123, July 15 @ 12:02 AM (0/0)

WLS, yes. This proposal, no. — pholmes, July 15 @ 11:53 AM (0/0)

new regulations re: domain names — kenred, July 15 @ 8:35 AM (0/0)

Opposed to WLS — Billl, July 15 @ 8:32 AM (3/3)

Verisign needs to be throttled — clarkdm, July 15 @ 4:00 PM (0/0)
Hold — nicowens, July 15 @ 3:22 PM (0/0)
All registrars hold names — pholmes, July 15 @ 11:58 AM (0/0)

No to Monopoly - Yes to Competition — mpatten, July 15 @ 7:28 AM (0/0)

I am Anti-WLS — George T. Williams, July 15 @ 7:19 AM (0/0)

a year's test - a smoke screen? — Stanley, July 15 @ 6:48 AM (0/0)

Why team with VeriSign? — mandoza, July 15 @ 3:38 AM (0/0)

NO to Verisign/SnapNames anti-competition proposal — csot, July 15 @ 3:18 AM (0/0)

No to WLS — gwardell, July 15 @ 3:16 AM (0/0)

Proposal — tpelz02, July 15 @ 3:00 AM (0/0)

Don't Get The Real Estate trade upset with an obvious "PowerGrab". — Doug Pace, July 15 @ 2:51 AM (0/0)

Yes to competition.. not to SnapNames! — excesss, July 15 @ 2:34 AM (0/0)

No to Verisign — viable, July 15 @ 1:23 AM (0/0)

I am opposed to this WLS! — Haldog, July 15 @ 1:17 AM (0/0)

Land Of The Free?� - NO to Verisign/Snapnames MONOPLOLY idea — dxcomms, July 15 @ 1:10 AM (0/0)

Vote NO For Verisign/Snapname Monopoly — nhendler, July 15 @ 1:04 AM (0/0)

Vote NO on VGRS Proposal for a Wait-Listing Service — elnkvince, July 15 @ 12:57 AM (0/0)

no verisign snapname monopoly — dakini, July 15 @ 12:31 AM (0/0)

Dotster Monopoly� +� WLS� Monopoly — Bennoart, July 15 @ 12:12 AM (0/0)

No!! to WLS. NO! NO! NO! — mgeneh, July 14 @ 11:45 PM (0/0)

"NO" to a Monopoly for Verisign — rlbrock, July 14 @ 11:44 PM (0/0)

No to Verisign/SnapNames monopoly — saltheart, July 14 @ 11:20 PM (0/0)

No to Monopoly. — mrweigand, July 14 @ 10:54 PM (1/1)

No Monopoly on WLS — jeanw, July 14 @ 11:06 PM (0/0)

VeriSign — AdaManTis, July 14 @ 10:17 PM (0/0)

No on WLS — kupietz, July 14 @ 9:38 PM (0/0)

Verisign's WSL Proposal — Citizen Kane, July 14 @ 8:45 PM (0/0)

WLS is a TERRIBLE idea! Sign the Petition please! — FCOI, July 14 @ 8:29 PM (0/0)

Voting No For The Proposal! — mdgrover, July 14 @ 8:13 PM (0/0)

WLS proposal will stifle competition and innovation — cshirer, July 14 @ 7:51 PM (0/0)

WLS? NO THX !! WE WANT COMPETITION — NOWLS, July 14 @ 7:05 PM (0/0)

Strongly Oppose VeriSign's Proposal — SteveMoore, July 14 @ 6:27 PM (0/0)

WLS-Verisign relief act — worldwidemedia, July 14 @ 6:22 PM (0/0)

Not to verisign — ChrisLucas, July 14 @ 6:15 PM (0/0)

How wait listing benefits customers — jcoons, July 14 @ 5:45 PM (0/0)

No to VeriSign's WLS Proposal — zeedesigns, July 14 @ 5:30 PM (0/0)

No to WLS — dweinberger, July 14 @ 5:25 PM (0/0)

no to wls — drdos42, July 14 @ 4:59 PM (0/0)

WLS Proposal!!! — CPiSites, July 14 @ 4:56 PM (1/1)

Perfectly stated! — loweandbehold, July 14 @ 6:53 PM (0/0)

WLS? NO! — chasbar, July 14 @ 4:52 PM (0/0)

I like what I am currently getting — pbj6805, July 14 @ 4:47 PM (0/0)

NO to VGRS WLS! — dlinsalata, July 14 @ 4:41 PM (0/0)

No to WLS — chrisscott, July 14 @ 4:40 PM (0/0)

Verisgn/Network Solutions — zoot, July 14 @ 4:32 PM (0/0)

It is all about Money — asanborn, July 14 @ 4:31 PM (0/0)

No trust for verisign — omacneil, July 14 @ 3:38 PM (0/0)

Isnt it amazing? — srinsriram, July 14 @ 1:47 PM (0/0)

VERISIGN WANTS BIDDING FOR DOMAIN NAME RENEWAL — mfinc@mail.com, July 14 @ 12:12 AM (0/0)

Verisign is not to be trusted! — ScottWM, July 14 @ 11:03 AM (0/0)

No to WLS, don't mess with success! — jsl, July 14 @ 11:02 AM (1/1)

What a crappy webforum this is — srinsriram, July 14 @ 1:44 PM (0/0)

no on wls — ruderod, July 14 @ 10:41 AM (0/0)

Wow — peterahunt, July 14 @ 10:19 AM (0/0)

Commentary Upon WLS Proposal — kamath, July 14 @ 10:11 AM (0/0)

Unfair Monopoly — Scott Citron, July 14 @ 10:02 AM (0/0)

Silly Proposition, No to the waiting list — dapted, July 14 @ 9:31 AM (0/0)

No to WLS — joanna lane, July 14 @ 9:27 AM (0/0)

ICANNot believe how stupid they think we are. (No to WLS) — duanemoody, July 14 @ 9:17 AM (0/0)

NO to WLS — KiwiInternet, July 14 @ 8:17 AM (0/0)

I support WLS if... — dotstersucks, July 14 @ 8:08 AM (4/8)

You forget.. — vengeance, July 15 @ 7:43 PM (0/0)
Strange... — cbria, July 15 @ 2:50 AM (1/1)

USD 35 vs USD 15 — dotstersucks, July 15 @ 6:31 AM (0/0)

can't support WLS at all... — excesss, July 15 @ 2:47 AM (2/2)

WLS, yes. This proposal, no. — pholmes, July 15 @ 11:51 AM (0/0)
a half-truth fact from you — dotstersucks, July 15 @ 6:59 AM (0/0)

How does that help? — jcoons, July 14 @ 6:17 PM (1/1)

WLS is good for majoroty, but for domain resellers — dotstersucks, July 15 @ 6:43 AM (0/0)

Say NO to proposal — Timberland, July 14 @ 8:01 AM (0/0)

WLS is just another Verisign power grab!!! — fredfenner, July 14 @ 7:49 AM (0/0)

WLS Unfair and Misleading — tlwilkins2, July 14 @ 7:33 AM (0/0)

Just Say No To Verisign — theonetruebix, July 14 @ 7:02 AM (0/0)

Say NO to the WLS proposal - VERISIGN is SLEAZY! — lonnypaul, July 14 @ 6:55 AM (1/1)

stop� WLS !!! — patricklin, July 14 @ 7:08 AM (0/0)

Please say no to the NS WLS proposal — Natedog_Com, July 14 @ 5:33 AM (1/1)

Agreed. — playbeasy, July 14 @ 6:40 AM (0/0)

a web developer's take — Beowulf, July 14 @ 5:24 AM (0/0)

domain registration — T, July 14 @ 5:21 AM (0/0)

Network Solutions — sglines, July 14 @ 5:08 AM (0/0)

no monopolies (network solutions was not a solution) — foundation, July 14 @ 4:35 AM (0/0)

Free Market over Disease — bueno, July 14 @ 4:12 AM (0/0)

WLS — diana777, July 14 @ 3:56 AM (0/0)

Bad idea=anything that costs me more $$ and aggravation — tony hana, July 14 @ 3:53 AM (0/0)

NO TO WLS - Note: Registration System is a Mess! — zartik, July 14 @ 3:36 AM (0/0)

WLS serves a very few — slr_s2, July 14 @ 3:35 AM (0/0)

Please ICANN, Do NOT help Verisign become a monopoly! — budley, July 14 @ 3:35 AM (0/0)

The Perspective of a Registrar's Channel Partner — jourdanb, July 14 @ 3:10 AM (0/0)

Verisign's Self-Serving Proposal — TombRaider, July 14 @ 3:01 AM (0/0)

wls — proftaker, July 14 @ 3:00 AM (0/0)

WLS is a terrible proposal! — Jedediah, July 14 @ 2:55 AM (0/0)

Why do we need a WLS?� And, of all companies, why should VeriSign run it? — drcheap, July 14 @ 2:32 AM (0/0)

No to WLS - Time to Divest — jdmacleod3rd, July 14 @ 2:29 AM (0/0)

No to WLS — trinitystudio, July 14 @ 2:26 AM (0/0)

No to WLS -- freedom of choice — David Dlugos, July 14 @ 2:03 AM (0/0)

Verisign's Proposal is Anti-American — zwief, July 14 @ 1:57 AM (1/1)

Amen — srinsriram, July 14 @ 2:01 PM (0/0)

Against� WLS — Haze, July 14 @ 1:53 AM (0/0)

NO to WLS — FreeMarketUSA, July 14 @ 1:42 AM (0/0)

Verisign and Domain Name Wait Listing Service (WLS) — clamprey, July 14 @ 1:33 AM (0/0)

NO to WLS — andorbal, July 14 @ 1:08 AM (0/0)

Don't Force Me to take BAD SERVICE at HIGH PRICES again! — David Hatlee, July 14 @ 1:06 AM (0/0)

VeriSign's Conflict of Interest: Registry and Registrar — e-focus, July 14 @ 1:03 AM (1/1)

conflict of interest — jourdanb, July 14 @ 4:18 AM (0/0)

NO TO WLS!!!!!!!!! — netrunner2250, July 14 @ 12:40 AM (0/0)

No to WLS — bonitakale, July 14 @ 12:16 AM (0/0)

VeriSign's WLS Proposal — dcukovich, July 14 @ 12:07 AM (0/0)

WLS - Another NO from the UK — cjr, July 14 @ 12:05 AM (0/0)

WLS — mickey7, July 14 @ 12:01 AM (0/0)

WLS - NO! — twalk, July 13 @ 11:56 PM (0/0)

No to WLS — mmp2000, July 13 @ 11:52 PM (0/0)

WLS - No No! — judex, July 13 @ 11:02 PM (0/0)

No� WLS especially for Verisign — Domain Name Recyclers, July 13 @ 10:48 PM (1/1)

If WLS is inevitable — Domain Name Recyclers, July 13 @ 10:56 PM (0/0)

The Verisign WLS proposal is a sham — dnachef, July 13 @ 10:45 PM (0/0)

Don't play Monopoly — instart, July 13 @ 10:36 PM (0/0)

Down with WLS — MrDarin, July 13 @ 10:20 PM (0/0)

Nothing good to say about Verisign — Luck, July 13 @ 10:16 PM (0/0)

OT - why does ICANN have the crappiest message board on the planet? — Page-Zone, July 13 @ 9:55 PM (2/2)

get a decent webboard for free — srinsriram, July 14 @ 2:08 PM (0/0)
see their shoddy website is good image on ICANN — dotstersucks, July 14 @ 5:52 AM (0/0)

VeriSign's evil business practices — StrobeAlific, July 13 @ 9:42 PM (0/0)

No WLS!!!! — COMPUTICA, July 13 @ 9:37 PM (0/0)

Verisign should be bankrupt, not expanding — Page-Zone, July 13 @ 9:36 PM (0/0)

WLS IS A GOOD, no bullshit — wbloniarz, July 13 @ 9:34 PM (5/6)

WLS GOOD??!! — cbria, July 14 @ 9:32 PM (0/0)
WLS/SnapNames = Communism, Insiders Paradise — eyeondomain.com, July 14 @ 4:08 PM (0/0)
one vs. many — mickey7, July 14 @ 12:11 AM (1/1)

WLS is allowed present registrar to take part..I support WLS IF... — dotstersucks, July 14 @ 6:08 AM (0/0)

Do you not like money ,free enterprise, or better service?!? — tallmann, July 14 @ 12:02 AM (0/0)
wbloniarz is a puppet of VeriSign — Innewvation, July 13 @ 9:39 PM (0/0)

Lawsuit to Prevent WLS and VeriSign Monopoly — Innewvation, July 13 @ 9:32 PM (0/0)

NO WLS - Vote against — openallday, July 13 @ 9:29 PM (0/0)

Vote No on Verisign WLS Monopoly — ScottSmith, July 13 @ 9:29 PM (0/0)

Another big money maker for the minority — jjscha, July 13 @ 9:25 PM (0/0)

who's in charge? — verysad, July 13 @ 9:23 PM (0/0)

No WLS! — FutureSights, July 13 @ 9:17 PM (0/0)

Verisign monopoly attempt — Cantu, July 13 @ 9:14 PM (0/0)

I oppose a waiting list!! — chezchicago, July 13 @ 9:07 PM (0/0)

Vote NO on WLS — DirectAddress, July 13 @ 9:06 PM (0/0)

Questionable Practices — icewalker, July 13 @ 9:05 PM (0/0)

WLS Proposal — Bernd Timmermann, July 13 @ 9:05 PM (0/0)

Verisign Proposal for Domain Name Wait Listing Service (WLS) — johben, July 13 @ 8:57 PM (0/0)

Do you love lawsuits? — mshep, July 13 @ 8:54 PM (0/0)

NO on VeriSign WLS proposal — bobgaskins, July 13 @ 8:52 PM (0/0)

Opposing the VGRS WLS Proposal — zabor16, July 13 @ 8:50 PM (0/0)

No to Verisign! — myronj, July 13 @ 8:49 PM (0/0)

Verisign Proposal for Domain Name Wait Listing Service (WLS) — jmawebco, July 13 @ 8:44 PM (0/0)

Do not stifle competition — jrl, July 13 @ 8:44 PM (0/0)

Not Verisign again! No on WLS! — dankar, July 13 @ 8:42 PM (0/0)

Domain Name Wait Listing Service — bthorn, July 13 @ 8:30 PM (0/0)

"Sorry! Your domain was (a minute ago) registered by someone else!" — verisign-sucks, July 13 @ 8:30 PM (0/0)

Current proposal is anticompetitive — greggw, July 13 @ 8:18 PM (0/0)

Verisign Proposal — mrsmith, July 13 @ 8:17 PM (0/0)

No to pop-ups on the Whois search page! — verisign-sucks, July 13 @ 8:17 PM (0/0)

ANTI-WLS; ANTI-MONOPOLY — Keith Klein, July 13 @ 8:16 PM (0/0)

Problem with the WLS proposal — kmagstadt, July 13 @ 8:09 PM (0/0)

No On Verisign and the WLS Proposal! — gstark, July 13 @ 8:03 PM (0/0)

Unsure — verisign-sucks, July 13 @ 7:57 PM (1/1)

My Vote — verisign-sucks, July 13 @ 8:04 PM (0/0)

WLS — kdonohue, July 13 @ 7:49 PM (0/0)

Verisign Proposal — cbria, July 13 @ 7:41 PM (0/0)

Verisgn Proposal — cg.matthews@gte.net, July 13 @ 7:37 PM (0/0)

WLS / (Verisign + SnapNames) = Monopoly — justisw, July 13 @ 7:35 PM (0/0)

WLS - What's the point? Vote No! — BHill, July 13 @ 7:35 PM (0/0)

No to VeriSign WLS Proposal — lightiv, July 13 @ 7:25 PM (0/0)

Verisign Proposal- Vote NO — ddixon64, July 13 @ 7:18 PM (0/0)

No to the WLS proposal — cnoronha, July 13 @ 7:05 PM (0/0)

VeriSign's WLS Proposal — gus, July 13 @ 7:05 PM (0/0)

MONOPOLIES ARE GREAT! — clesson, July 13 @ 7:00 PM (0/0)

I am against the WLS proposal — rrice68, July 13 @ 6:57 PM (0/0)

MONOPOLY NOT FAIR — STOREKFL, July 13 @ 6:46 PM (0/0)

NO to WLS Proposal — scgtb, July 13 @ 6:45 PM (0/0)

Do not support VeriSign's WLS — jtredway, July 13 @ 6:43 PM (0/0)

wls proposal — cwhaley, July 13 @ 6:40 PM (0/0)

Why WLS is bad policy. — againstwls, July 13 @ 6:36 PM (2/2)

well said — srinsriram, July 14 @ 2:27 PM (0/0)
againstwls — gus, July 13 @ 7:19 PM (0/0)

Court Costs — huntsalot, July 13 @ 6:36 PM (1/1)

agreed — STOREKFL, July 13 @ 6:54 PM (0/0)

Leave the Internet alone, STOP trying to play god! — syeoman, July 13 @ 6:33 PM (0/0)

WLS & exclusive agreement with Verisign — 4billl, July 13 @ 6:31 PM (0/0)

Do not reward Verisign's Lack of Integrity!!!!! — Maureen Christopher, July 13 @ 6:25 PM (0/0)

Competitive evolution VS Monopolised Solution — bunsilat, July 13 @ 6:21 PM (0/0)

Consolidation of Registrars — Applicon, July 13 @ 6:20 PM (0/0)

Adopting the WLS Proposal by VeriSign is a mistake — Bolmanski, July 13 @ 6:19 PM (0/0)

Just some more thoughts — robertbaird, July 13 @ 6:15 PM (0/0)

No on WLS Proposal — ccohn, July 13 @ 6:06 PM (0/0)

Rethink Business Model of DNS — netaka, July 13 @ 6:02 PM (0/0)

WLS Proposal - I strongly oppose it — nhr2000, July 13 @ 5:58 PM (0/0)

No Domain Registration Monopoly — Etowah, July 13 @ 5:56 PM (0/0)

Oppose the WLS — mulderig, July 13 @ 5:55 PM (0/0)

WLS is a bad idea! — eparrisMI, July 13 @ 5:47 PM (0/0)

Objection to WLS — jelle, July 13 @ 5:44 PM (0/0)

No Thank You to Another Monopoly — jjames, July 13 @ 5:30 PM (0/0)

NO� to WLS Proposal — gmaa, July 13 @ 5:27 PM (0/0)

SAY NO TO WLS — kaido, July 13 @ 5:25 PM (0/0)

Monopoly with no disputes allowed, how nice... — Steady, July 13 @ 5:23 PM (0/0)

Strong NO to WLS — Colorami, July 13 @ 5:16 PM (0/0)

WLS — vators, July 13 @ 5:16 PM (0/0)

No to WLS — djl86, July 13 @ 5:13 PM (0/0)

Voice from China: Don't support WLS — colinjin, July 13 @ 5:07 PM (0/0)

Strong No to WLS — elmared, July 13 @ 5:06 PM (0/0)

No WLS — avalencia, July 13 @ 4:57 PM (0/0)

No Snapname monopoly! — johncody, July 13 @ 4:55 PM (0/0)

I do not support the WLS proposal. — tlyczko, July 13 @ 4:41 PM (0/0)

WLS — Amvest, July 13 @ 4:27 PM (0/0)

Against WLS Proposal — rrmcfadden, July 13 @ 4:22 PM (0/0)

I am shocked -- where are SnapNames ethics? — pholzmann, July 13 @ 4:18 PM (1/1)

WLS proposal — dexful, July 13 @ 4:25 PM (0/0)

WLS - no! — n2az, July 13 @ 4:13 PM (0/0)

I vote "NO" on WLS — yresim, July 13 @ 4:11 PM (0/0)

Against the Domain Name Wait Listing Service — Jaypoc, July 13 @ 4:00 PM (0/0)

Why do corporations think they rule? — Dennirj, July 13 @ 3:55 PM (0/0)

wait list proposal — bbg57, July 13 @ 3:48 PM (0/0)

Verisign already has too much monopoly power — rfrenkel, July 13 @ 3:43 PM (0/0)

Keep it free — mikael, July 13 @ 3:35 PM (0/0)

waitlisting domain names — gsherr, July 13 @ 3:27 PM (0/0)

Keep Our Choices Open — Website Bill, July 13 @ 3:24 PM (0/0)

Eliminate monopoly breeding ground — eddiesaug, July 13 @ 3:20 PM (0/0)

Why? VERISIGN want to GRAB expired domain market :0? — IneedHit, July 13 @ 3:14 PM (0/0)

Take a biopsy of Versign, and you will find it malignant! — gebest, July 13 @ 3:14 PM (0/0)

ICANN still puppet of Verisign? — kevinh999, July 13 @ 3:13 PM (0/0)

Just Say NO — nora, July 13 @ 3:04 PM (0/0)

And by the way... — viveka web, July 13 @ 3:02 PM (0/0)

Discard the proposal — osierra, July 13 @ 3:02 PM (0/0)

quite simply, WLS stinks — flarp, July 13 @ 2:57 PM (0/0)

"No" to WLS — pac, July 13 @ 2:56 PM (0/0)

ICANN WLS Proposal — Alvis, July 13 @ 2:45 PM (0/0)

VeriSign and WLS — bobc, July 13 @ 2:41 PM (0/0)

Network Solutions Proposa; — phoenixeagle, July 13 @ 2:39 PM (0/0)

Let be honest — Valdas, July 13 @ 2:01 PM (0/0)

Vote YES, kill dot com. — viveka web, July 13 @ 1:44 PM (0/0)

ICANN considering this proposal implies that the organisation is corrupt or incompetent — chris-in-london, July 13 @ 12:39 AM (0/0)

Agree with WLS provided the price is less than US$ 15 — dotstersucks, July 13 @ 12:10 AM (0/0)

WLS Proposal - is there any better world for all of us? — oleg, July 13 @ 12:01 AM (0/0)

Verisign WLS Proposal = Dead Rat — Sarge the Poet, July 13 @ 12:00 AM (1/1)

Missed the Link Here it is — Sarge the Poet, July 13 @ 12:11 AM (0/0)

STOP Verisign - these times are gone!!! — wsog, July 13 @ 11:58 AM (0/0)

Notwork Solutions/Verisign SUX, thats why they want to monopolize the system — pen-cel, July 13 @ 11:45 AM (0/0)

Stop Versign Monopoly� - Sign the Anti WLS Petition — WillT, July 13 @ 11:32 AM (0/0)

WLS is not fairer than the current situation - why not a WLWLS? — stevie, July 13 @ 11:29 AM (0/0)

No to VeriSign...We have a Choice...No more Monopolies — InternetFreedom, July 13 @ 11:24 AM (0/0)

Veriloosers and its Dog Snapper — HateVerisign, July 13 @ 11:17 AM (1/1)

Make sure you read the entire board — GeorgeK, July 13 @ 11:55 AM (0/0)

A plain NO to WLS — SEATi, July 13 @ 10:56 AM (0/0)

VeriSign's proposal — xh, July 13 @ 10:54 AM (0/0)

Is VeriSign another MicroSoft in the making? — Kriis, July 13 @ 10:39 AM (0/0)

I strongly disagree with this WLS proposal. — asf, July 13 @ 10:35 AM (0/0)

why is this even up for vote — jwill, July 13 @ 10:19 AM (0/0)

Keep domains in the free enterprise system — AllenW, July 13 @ 10:08 AM (0/0)

WLS — gpj, July 13 @ 9:59 AM (0/0)

DISMANTLE VERSIGN - I'm not kidding — AJB, July 13 @ 9:54 AM (0/0)

WLS proposal — philmanf, July 13 @ 9:51 AM (0/0)

You must be kidding!!!!!! — dhill, July 13 @ 9:46 AM (0/0)

Two words: Class Action — HateVerisign, July 13 @ 9:45 AM (0/0)

Why don't we just let Verisign implant chips in our heads? — Matt_Rossi, July 13 @ 9:33 AM (1/1)

Don't worry --- maybe we should..... — AllenW, July 13 @ 10:12 AM (0/0)

Why WLS is bad — jaysern, July 13 @ 9:26 AM (0/0)

Verisign, anything for money? — zonkerharris, July 13 @ 9:26 AM (0/0)

No to WLS — steveb999, July 13 @ 9:24 AM (0/0)

wls proposal, I'am saying NO — likharev, July 13 @ 9:20 AM (0/0)

Proposed changes unnecessary & harmful — boots, July 13 @ 9:08 AM (0/0)

Vote no to the WLS proposal — smallfry, July 13 @ 9:07 AM (0/0)

ICANN is the regulator, not Verisign — pholmes, July 13 @ 9:06 AM (0/0)

Strongly opposed to WLS — syeager, July 13 @ 9:00 AM (0/0)

WLS is anti-consumer — jvoge1, July 13 @ 9:00 AM (1/1)

Well Put — gabe225, July 13 @ 9:21 AM (0/0)

Just more corporate greed... Say NO! — timvwcom, July 13 @ 8:59 AM (0/0)

Fully Oppose — icann@thecrackshack.com, July 13 @ 8:50 AM (0/0)

OPPOSED to WLS — TimRiker, July 13 @ 8:45 AM (0/0)

WLS is bad for consumers — JohnA, July 13 @ 8:41 AM (0/0)

Domain Name Wait Listing Service — Umpy11, July 13 @ 8:30 AM (1/1)

Amen to competition — jconway, July 13 @ 8:42 AM (0/0)

ICANN: Don't spoil your record — No_no_no, July 13 @ 8:27 AM (0/0)

Network Solutions and SnapNames - a terrible combination! — mjaiss, July 13 @ 8:24 AM (0/0)

wait listing proposal — steptoe88, July 13 @ 8:10 AM (0/0)

WLS� Verisign� Fascism: Stop the Tyranny! — musicgirl, July 13 @ 8:03 AM (0/0)

OPPOSED to WLS as currently proposed — gilk, July 13 @ 7:58 AM (0/0)

The Verisign/SnapNames proposal is seriously flawed. — pwargo, July 13 @ 7:56 AM (0/0)

Please, do not allow this to pass. NSI in a word FRUSTRATING — jasongodsey, July 13 @ 7:28 AM (0/0)

The WLS proposal is terrible — ggearing, July 13 @ 7:28 AM (0/0)

STOP MONOPOLY - BASTA DE MONOPOLIOS — ggf, July 13 @ 7:23 AM (0/0)

Proposed Wait-Listing Service seems unfair — hrbeing, July 13 @ 7:23 AM (0/0)

Opposed to WLS — fsbjunior, July 13 @ 7:22 AM (0/0)

VeriSign/SnapNames partnership... — avxmedia, July 13 @ 7:15 AM (0/0)

Verisign proposal — Rastaman, July 13 @ 7:14 AM (0/0)

Oh, please -- not MORE VeriSign! — boyles, July 13 @ 7:14 AM (0/0)

No to Verisign and consumer gouging — kccking, July 13 @ 7:04 AM (0/0)

ICANN Being Bribed by Verisign — FairShare, July 13 @ 7:01 AM (0/0)

verisign: the would-be monopolist — dietricha, July 13 @ 6:58 AM (0/0)

No — virtualcharlie, July 13 @ 6:57 AM (0/0)

verisign is anti-consumer — chilkat, July 13 @ 6:54 AM (0/0)

Network Shenanigans Rides Again. Vote NO WLS! — PaulHouse, July 13 @ 6:52 AM (0/0)

Yes, please! I WANT to pay more! — aelfa, July 13 @ 6:36 AM (0/0)

Enron, WorldCom, Verisign/NetworktSolutions - birds of a feather. — JohnHuang, July 13 @ 6:35 AM (1/1)

Let the little guys play too — aelfa, July 13 @ 6:41 AM (0/0)

Another Objection to Verisign. — dragonmun, July 13 @ 6:22 AM (0/0)

No to monopoly. — jfarjona, July 13 @ 6:20 AM (0/0)

Keep competition alive - Just say NO! to monopolies. — albuck, July 13 @ 6:20 AM (0/0)

Verisign's anticompetitive shenanigans — wayneah, July 13 @ 6:16 AM (0/0)

Verisign Proposes More Ways To Cheat Domain Name Holders... — xrisj, July 13 @ 6:15 AM (0/0)

WLS is bad for the little guy — Full Metal, July 13 @ 6:14 AM (0/0)

Verisign must be stopped — RyanNeeley, July 13 @ 6:09 AM (0/0)

Stop Verisign!! — dpk, July 13 @ 5:48 AM (0/0)

IWL proposal is awful!! — posspringtime, July 13 @ 5:47 AM (0/0)

BULLSHIT! — crystalfusion, July 13 @ 5:39 AM (0/0)

Verisign has broken promises... — ppassarelli, July 13 @ 5:39 AM (0/0)

WLS proposal is not in the best interest of the public — jentigges, July 13 @ 5:32 AM (0/0)

Just Say No! — krfagans, July 13 @ 5:28 AM (0/0)

Outrage at Verisign proposal — animal57, July 13 @ 5:26 AM (0/0)

WLS would be an anti-competitive gift to Verisign and their partner. — SNAFU, July 13 @ 5:22 AM (0/0)

Please don't stifle competition — cschang, July 13 @ 5:21 AM (0/0)

WLS proposal — bricksplusclicks, July 13 @ 5:19 AM (0/0)

Domain Name Wait Listing Service — stanlieberman, July 13 @ 5:18 AM (0/0)

This Limits our Choice — lizhong, July 13 @ 5:14 AM (0/0)

no WLS please — nethawk, July 13 @ 5:14 AM (0/0)

This WLS proposal is a BAD IDEA — trakwebster, July 13 @ 5:06 AM (0/0)

Please NO to WLS proposal — carolyn2, July 13 @ 5:03 AM (0/0)

NO TO NS� \ VERISIGN — nytegod, July 13 @ 5:03 AM (0/0)

who does icann represent here? — dodgy , July 13 @ 4:29 AM (0/0)

No to WLS — CraJack, July 13 @ 4:24 AM (0/0)

Opposition to WLS Proposal — rhelmer, July 13 @ 4:20 AM (0/0)

Verisign getting in bed w/ govt — thetimer, July 13 @ 4:14 AM (2/2)

Free medical care — verisign-sucks, July 13 @ 8:26 PM (0/0)
Dctatrshp? — verisign-sucks, July 13 @ 8:23 PM (0/0)

Proposition — dvance, July 13 @ 4:12 AM (1/1)

I am strongly opposed to the proposal. — amandak, July 13 @ 4:19 AM (0/0)

WLS is the answer to a non-existent problem. — bradipo, July 13 @ 3:52 AM (0/0)

wls and verisign — mberst, July 13 @ 3:48 AM (0/0)

Reduction in competition is bad for the consumer — hthrnnclrk, July 13 @ 3:34 AM (0/0)

Why does ICANNA add to the cost and complexity — Carol Schneider, July 13 @ 3:28 AM (0/0)

No tourniquet to the neck, please — estrong, July 13 @ 3:26 AM (0/0)

We will not be HELD HOSTAGE by Verisign again! — NiceIce, July 13 @ 3:20 AM (1/1)

Do NOT let NetSol/VeriSign be a party on WLS — Douglas, July 13 @ 4:24 AM (0/0)

Wait List I Oppose — webappermb, July 13 @ 3:09 AM (1/1)

Wait List — welldog, July 13 @ 3:26 AM (0/0)

Against — myswd, July 13 @ 2:48 AM (0/0)

Domain Name Wait Listing Service (WLS) — rvbasics, July 13 @ 2:47 AM (0/0)

Keep Competition — jimhnet, July 13 @ 1:18 AM (0/0)

WLS Absolute Opposition — interstel, July 13 @ 1:15 AM (0/0)

Do Verisign & SnapNames Consider WLS a done deal? — eyeondomain.com, July 12 @ 10:50 PM (1/1)

Yes, They Do Consider This A Done Deal — swvincent, July 13 @ 8:56 PM (0/0)

Great Job by Transfers Task Force — GeorgeK, July 12 @ 5:48 PM (0/0)

No to WLS — swvincent, July 11 @ 6:59 PM (1/2)

NO To Change — waded1, July 13 @ 12:53 AM (1/1)

Browser: Microsoft Internet Explorer V6.0 using Windows 98 — supersoccermom, July 13 @ 3:26 AM (0/0)

Information about domain names — malimali, July 11 @ 3:45 PM (0/0)

anti wls petition — andrewmuck, July 10 @ 6:06 AM (0/0)

ICANN Proposal on Wait Listing — naavi_india, July 1 @ 7:59 AM (0/0)

WLS is the ONLY WAY — moler, June 29 @ 1:31 PM (3/10)

Insider Trading? — HateVerisign, July 13 @ 10:15 AM (0/0)
Strange thought pattern and wrong — webappermb, July 13 @ 3:11 AM (0/0)
Yes... — HWhiting, June 30 @ 8:15 AM (1/7)

Absolutely. — moler, June 30 @ 11:04 AM (1/6)

You are clueless. — HWhiting, July 1 @ 5:33 AM (1/5)

Blah — moler, July 1 @ 7:46 PM (2/4)

Are you nuts? — pwargo, July 13 @ 8:02 AM (0/0)
Nothing could be worse... — Meo, July 4 @ 7:28 AM (1/2)

ridiculous — NL, July 13 @ 2:09 AM (1/1)

Here! Here! — bryancd2, July 13 @ 3:29 PM (0/0)

I also oppose WLS — trb, June 28 @ 12:20 AM (0/0)

Access to used and expired domain names — Juan E. Zuniga, June 27 @ 8:10 PM (4/4)

re: Access to used and expired domain names — interstel, July 13 @ 1:18 AM (0/0)
WLS will not give you more access to names... — WilliamC, July 2 @ 1:44 AM (0/0)
Presumptious — GeorgeK, June 27 @ 8:59 PM (0/0)
Unless YOU have a roomful of computers.... — MEO, June 27 @ 8:31 PM (0/0)

WLS — sanremo2211, June 27 @ 5:42 PM (0/0)

I oppose WLS. — ChrisC, June 27 @ 9:29 AM (0/0)

Verisign's 45 day grace period and WLS? — stacia, June 27 @ 7:52 AM (1/1)

Ah, there may be a bigger plan.... — MEO, June 27 @ 10:00 AM (0/0)

Verisign: Clean Your Room! — MEO, June 26 @ 5:38 PM (1/3)

He's involved with SnapNames, what did you expect? — GeorgeK, June 26 @ 7:46 PM (1/2)

Involvement with SnapNames is Good — SteveICANN, June 27 @ 3:12 AM (1/1)

... but Conspiracy to restrain trade is bad. Very bad. — MEO, June 27 @ 9:54 AM (0/0)

Falling Prey to the VeriSign Beast — eyeondomain.com, June 26 @ 4:54 PM (0/0)

Independent - Unsolicited - Unbiased - Unpetitioned - WLS vote by expiring domain customers — eyeondomain.com, June 26 @ 8:08 AM (1/3)

Rediculous Poll — supersoccermom, June 27 @ 8:48 PM (2/2)

look twice before you speak — eyeondomain.com, June 28 @ 1:37 AM (0/0)
Shilling.... — GeorgeK, June 27 @ 9:04 PM (0/0)

WLS not! — PhiDeck, June 25 @ 8:16 PM (0/0)

Access to expiring domain names — julieroll, June 25 @ 8:04 PM (1/2)

This is PROOF that Snap is manufacturing these — chip-y, June 25 @ 8:09 PM (1/1)

lol — GeorgeK, June 25 @ 11:33 PM (0/0)

End-Users' Letter to ICANN — Mason Cole, June 25 @ 6:26 AM (2/5)

Bogus signatures? — chip-y, June 25 @ 8:05 PM (0/0)
There's a sucker born.... — MEO, June 25 @ 9:24 AM (1/3)

"The Registrar level services offered today are working fine" ?!!!? — SteveICANN, June 25 @ 5:20 PM (2/2)

Are they not working Steve? — chip-y, June 25 @ 8:07 PM (0/0)
Sweet Dreams of WLS in Wonderland — MEO, June 25 @ 7:37 PM (0/0)

WLS does not even warrant discussion — chip-y, June 25 @ 4:55 AM (1/1)

I have to agree — WilliamC, July 2 @ 1:56 AM (0/0)

WLS — kevinotippett, June 24 @ 11:58 PM (1/1)

MEO too! — MEO, June 25 @ 9:35 AM (0/0)

My concerns as a consumer. — ChrisC, June 24 @ 5:44 AM (0/0)

WLS — natel, June 24 @ 3:19 AM (1/1)

Another Oregonian, haha! — GeorgeK, June 24 @ 5:48 AM (0/0)

Registrars access is limited by Snaps system — dmwascher, June 23 @ 4:14 PM (0/0)

Define Subscription Rights, all else follows... — MEO, June 23 @ 7:03 AM (0/0)

slashdot.org on WLS� =� out of 167 posts only 4 support WLS — nsihorrorstories.com, June 23 @ 4:48 AM (1/3)

Out of 167 posts, only a handful even discuss WLS! — SteveICANN, June 25 @ 5:09 PM (2/2)

Full disclosure, Steve? — JohnA, July 13 @ 11:20 AM (0/0)
I beg to differ — nsihorrorstories.com, June 27 @ 7:45 PM (0/0)

WLS : No Secondary Market Here! — meo, June 22 @ 11:11 PM (0/0)

SnapNames — Jeff3, June 22 @ 10:48 PM (1/2)

Huh? Selective Drops — meo, June 22 @ 10:59 PM (1/1)

RE: Huh? Selective Drops — Jeff3, June 22 @ 11:16 PM (0/0)

verisign — sgsrace, June 22 @ 9:56 PM (0/0)

United States Postmaster investigating Verisign for Mail Fraud — nsihorrorstories.com, June 22 @ 7:30 PM (0/0)

It took� 2 Federal Judges to get VRSN cease it's Deceptive Poaching Campaigns misleading Consumers — nsihorrorstories.com, June 22 @ 7:09 PM (0/0)

Verisign Subject of 12 Class Actions 4 Allegedly Violating SEC rules — nsihorrorstories.com, June 22 @ 6:15 PM (0/0)

Another 51 Pages from SnapNames — DonBrown, June 22 @ 4:41 PM (1/1)

Good Job! — meo, June 22 @ 11:48 PM (0/0)

Should the VGRS .com/.net/.org contracts be terminated? — chip-y, June 22 @ 8:29 AM (0/0)

The WLS supporters all dried up — chip-y, June 22 @ 7:56 AM (0/0)

WLS as "Abusive Speculation" — MEO, June 21 @ 11:21 PM (0/0)

WLS: Here's what we really think! — MEO, June 21 @ 11:11 PM (1/1)

Well put — chip-y, June 22 @ 7:44 AM (0/0)

WLS is a Scam — im_bigjohn, June 21 @ 10:56 PM (0/0)

Technology? Duh! — MEO, June 21 @ 9:11 PM (1/1)

That's affected.... — meo, June 21 @ 9:15 PM (0/0)

www.clickbeast.com (AOL IM Chatroom "Domains") for WLS Debate — GeorgeK, June 21 @ 8:17 PM (0/0)

WLS — kbaisden, June 21 @ 7:19 PM (0/0)

Why don't WLS lobbyists follow-up? — chip-y, June 21 @ 6:26 PM (0/0)

I SUPPORT WLS — TheBFB, June 21 @ 12:11 AM (0/0)

Support for Wait listing service — calukijack, June 21 @ 9:32 AM (4/4)

In reality: No Footing! — meo, June 21 @ 9:13 PM (0/0)
Wouldn't it be grand if this were true? — MEO, June 21 @ 8:59 PM (0/0)
Another question. . . — chip-y, June 21 @ 6:30 PM (0/0)
Guess again... — HWhiting, June 21 @ 10:13 AM (0/0)

WLS more fair and efficient — emechner, June 21 @ 9:11 AM (4/9)

Unfortunately the law precludes stealing — totoole, June 23 @ 6:04 PM (0/0)
Real "middlemen" don't use smoke screens — MEO, June 21 @ 9:35 PM (0/0)
Fundamental Flaw in your argument — Gary-bm, June 21 @ 5:29 PM (1/2)

So you can't eradicate speculation completely — emechner, June 21 @ 6:03 PM (1/1)

You're kidding yourself — chip-y, June 21 @ 10:23 PM (0/0)

Are you kidding??? — HWhiting, June 21 @ 10:28 AM (1/3)

not kidding. — emechner, June 21 @ 5:21 PM (2/2)

Your not-a-sure-thing WLS will set a price for another buyer — askii, June 22 @ 6:19 AM (0/0)
Coase Theorem — GeorgeK, June 21 @ 8:09 PM (0/0)

Why the pricing model? — chip-y, June 21 @ 4:55 AM (0/0)

WLS is bad — supersoccermom, June 21 @ 3:44 AM (1/1)

This guy is clueless ;) — MEO, June 21 @ 9:44 PM (0/0)

Part II:� The Merits of the WLS, Including Pricing (Redux) — Cameron Powell, June 21 @ 3:15 AM (3/3)

I am astounded — davidhale, June 21 @ 11:55 PM (0/0)
A firm grasp on Unreality! — meo, June 21 @ 9:21 PM (0/0)
Care to elaborate? — chip-y, June 21 @ 4:21 AM (0/0)

Part II:� The Merits of the WLS, Including Pricing — Cameron Powell, June 21 @ 2:39 AM (1/1)

Your link didn't work -- try again -- and comment — GeorgeK, June 21 @ 2:50 AM (0/0)

An invitation to debate on AOL Instant Messenger chat! — GeorgeK, June 21 @ 2:26 AM (0/0)

I oppose the WLS — Stormy, June 21 @ 1:36 AM (1/1)

This guy is right! — MEO, June 21 @ 10:00 PM (0/0)

Portland-Schmortland: Those insisting on democracy can least afford to be anti-democratic — Anati, June 21 @ 12:47 AM (2/2)

Legal incorrect or just morally bankrupt? — MEO, June 21 @ 11:05 PM (0/0)
What's certain..... — GeorgeK, June 21 @ 1:39 AM (0/0)

WLS and the short sited. — DanR, June 20 @ 11:31 PM (1/1)

... or so it "seems" — MEO, June 21 @ 10:32 PM (0/0)

Objective View Shows WLS falls short of a solution — ec18, June 20 @ 10:01 PM (1/1)

I agree with ec18 — shannon, June 20 @ 10:39 PM (0/0)

BEWARE MOST OF THE PRO-WLS ARE STILL FAKE ENTRIES — mmann, June 20 @ 8:48 PM (0/0)

Forcible reassignment of unused domain names — TheGamesForum, June 20 @ 8:43 PM (0/0)

WLS — RufusChoate, June 20 @ 8:34 PM (0/0)

WLS - The Right Approach, The Right Time — imprimis, June 20 @ 7:56 PM (1/1)

Ah, did you not do your homework? — MEO, June 21 @ 10:21 PM (0/0)

How can you support WLS? — stacia, June 20 @ 7:39 PM (0/0)

WLS support — johnb, June 20 @ 7:36 PM (1/1)

Sorry, you meant 'totalitarian' — chip-y, June 20 @ 10:57 PM (0/0)

Support for WLS — bhausman, June 20 @ 6:57 PM (1/1)

This makes no sense at all — chip-y, June 20 @ 10:52 PM (0/0)

Support for currently proposed equal access by WLS — Jus, June 20 @ 6:54 PM (2/2)

Hey, credit where credit is due! — MEO, June 21 @ 10:42 PM (0/0)
Nobody outside of Portland supports WLS — mmann, June 20 @ 8:52 PM (0/0)

Oppose WLS - Unapologetic handout to Verisign — mbkali, June 20 @ 6:50 PM (0/0)

I support WlS — Coleman, June 20 @ 6:22 PM (0/0)

Petition to the moderator of this forum - public is invited to sign — bpasser, June 20 @ 3:05 PM (0/0)

Perspective on the WLS — hebwdc, June 20 @ 2:15 PM (1/1)

You really need to quote source! — MEO, June 21 @ 11:32 PM (0/0)

Recruited "supporters" of WLS -- many from SnapNames' hometown -- Google has *outed* you! — GeorgeK, June 20 @ 6:26 AM (0/0)

I Support WLS — BrightSpot, June 20 @ 5:47 AM (1/1)

Same old condition — dmwascher, June 20 @ 7:18 AM (0/0)

I support WLS — hh248, June 20 @ 5:13 AM (1/1)

Please use quotes... — MEO, June 21 @ 11:09 PM (0/0)

Support for WLS — jessrepa, June 20 @ 5:05 AM (2/2)

Another WLS Supporter from Portland,OR (SnapNames Hometown)? — jeffb1, June 20 @ 5:26 AM (0/0)
How does WLS stop those of financial means from monopolizing the options market? — totoole, June 20 @ 5:20 AM (0/0)

THIS LIST IS CORRUPTED BY FAKE ENTRIES FROM SNAPNAMES — mmann, June 20 @ 4:19 AM (2/2)

Support for WLS from Iowa — lisaedwards, June 20 @ 4:28 PM (0/0)
"Unique stakeholders" (more the latter then the former) — gharring, June 20 @ 3:59 PM (0/0)

Support for WLS — Liz.Dexia@juno.com, June 20 @ 2:35 AM (0/0)

WLS is necessary — padvert, June 20 @ 2:19 AM (3/3)

WLS "For Sale" — MEO, June 21 @ 11:29 PM (0/0)
WLS is a waste of time — dmwascher, June 20 @ 7:06 AM (0/0)
Do you KNOW the REASON thousands of names never dropped? — askii, June 20 @ 4:00 AM (0/0)

Support WLS — kkelley, June 20 @ 2:11 AM (1/3)

Where is the open and fair — dmwascher, June 20 @ 7:00 AM (1/2)

pricing is the problem — kkelley, June 20 @ 7:08 PM (1/1)

The prices were higher in the 90's when the hoarding began. — totoole, June 21 @ 12:41 AM (0/0)

The WLS is the a fair solution. — jpinkal, June 20 @ 1:49 AM (0/0)

The way it should be — castanza, June 20 @ 1:17 AM (1/1)

Apprently you know nothing about fair open markets that made the USA great — mmann, June 20 @ 4:22 AM (0/0)

I support the WLS — vmac00, June 20 @ 12:57 AM (0/0)

Oppose WLS - it's rather obvious why — Gary-bm, June 20 @ 12:37 AM (1/1)

Very Well Put (No Text) — jfiliss, June 20 @ 3:46 AM (0/0)

WLS — crambrose, June 20 @ 12:28 AM (1/1)

SnapNames Hometown — jeffb1, June 20 @ 12:46 AM (0/0)

WLS — kian, June 19 @ 11:37 PM (3/3)

WLS is NOT logical — shannon, June 20 @ 12:29 AM (0/0)
I would think a PhD would have altered a template letter a bit — askii, June 20 @ 12:13 AM (0/0)
oppose WLS — groundhog, June 19 @ 11:44 PM (0/0)

Please do not support the WLS. — klr, June 19 @ 11:34 PM (0/0)

Oppose WLS — toni4444, June 19 @ 11:28 PM (0/0)

What's to Love, and What's Not to Love about WLS — magross, June 19 @ 10:49 PM (0/0)

Support WLS — EJW, June 19 @ 10:48 PM (2/2)

No chance — dmwascher, June 19 @ 11:01 PM (0/0)
oppose WLS — groundhog, June 19 @ 10:55 PM (0/0)

$250 million — mtb, June 19 @ 10:47 PM (0/0)

WLS IS WRONG AND UNFAIR — bsquizza, June 19 @ 10:37 PM (1/1)

What's "unfair" about a specuclator's dream tool? — MEO, June 21 @ 11:36 PM (0/0)

Neteka Support's WLS — foleyj, June 19 @ 10:19 PM (0/0)

Oppose WLS — michelle613, June 19 @ 10:07 PM (0/0)

Oppose WLS, it rips off consumers and inhibits competition — shannon, June 19 @ 10:05 PM (0/0)

Support the WLS — kkarger, June 19 @ 9:41 PM (2/2)

fair access?? — mtb, June 19 @ 10:38 PM (0/0)
i think you mean oppose. — kerryg, June 19 @ 9:49 PM (0/0)

Oppose WLS — groundhog, June 19 @ 9:37 PM (0/0)

Request for transparency — chip-y, June 19 @ 9:09 PM (0/0)

Oppose WLS - Anti-Competition, Anti-Consumer, No Consumer Benefit — DonBrown, June 19 @ 8:25 PM (0/0)

Oppose WLS — chip-y, June 19 @ 8:06 PM (2/2)

finally, someone who knows what their talking about — mtb, June 19 @ 10:40 PM (0/0)
Sounds right to me — kerryg, June 19 @ 9:46 PM (0/0)

Huge Ripoff by NSI and SnapNames — lmann, June 19 @ 7:51 PM (0/0)

Domain waiting list. — kevinc, June 19 @ 7:36 PM (1/2)

The speculator would own it with a WLS too — mmann, June 19 @ 7:39 PM (1/1)

I agree the cost of names will go up... way up — askii, June 19 @ 8:33 PM (0/0)

Oppose WLS — askii, June 19 @ 6:57 PM (0/0)

Support WLS — DeborahC, June 19 @ 6:53 PM (2/2)

Does WLS solve the problem? — totoole, June 19 @ 7:51 PM (0/0)
Laugh of the Day — GeorgeK, June 19 @ 7:09 PM (0/0)

Obvious Monopolistic Fraud by Monopolists with Practice — mmann, June 19 @ 6:52 PM (0/0)

Please support WLS — charliek, June 19 @ 6:22 PM (1/1)

Man Exploits Man! — MEO, June 21 @ 11:42 PM (0/0)

Supporting WLS — dlw, June 19 @ 6:17 PM (1/1)

How does WLS level the playing field? — totoole, June 19 @ 8:55 PM (0/0)

Support the WLS Proposal — drclark, June 19 @ 6:05 PM (0/0)

Another solution — totoole, June 19 @ 5:43 PM (0/0)

If Verisign were doing the right thing we wouldn't even be talking about this — j1107067, June 19 @ 5:39 PM (0/0)

Oppose WLS — jeffb1, June 19 @ 5:39 PM (0/0)

Supportr WLS — johnahrens, June 19 @ 5:36 PM (0/0)

WLS adoption — trcole3, June 19 @ 5:21 PM (0/0)

WLS Proposal — xjeremy, June 19 @ 5:06 PM (0/0)

We Need the WLS — webstix, June 19 @ 4:36 PM (0/0)

WLS — Anati, June 19 @ 3:40 PM (0/0)

domain system — bunny, June 19 @ 3:33 PM (0/0)

SUPPORT WLS — localwhois, June 19 @ 2:46 PM (1/1)

Exody wants to know — askii, June 19 @ 8:14 PM (0/0)

Support WLS — eleifer, June 19 @ 2:24 PM (1/2)

Absolutely Support WLS — SteveICANN, June 19 @ 4:23 PM (1/1)

You are way off target — askii, June 19 @ 11:34 PM (0/0)

Support WLS — kokopelli, June 19 @ 1:11 PM (1/2)

Try SnapNames today! — MEO, June 21 @ 11:15 PM (1/1)

Why isn't certainty better than "SnapNames today"? — SteveICANN, June 27 @ 3:50 AM (0/0)

I support the WLS because I'm not a "pro" and I'm not a speculator. — JodyS, June 19 @ 9:27 AM (2/2)

One Strike You're Out! — MEO, June 21 @ 11:53 PM (0/0)
WLS is a gamble not a sure thing - false hope — askii, June 19 @ 11:13 PM (0/0)

I support the WLS — chrisita, June 19 @ 7:21 AM (0/0)

proposed Wait Listing Service (WLS) at the ICANN meeting — mommaJ, June 19 @ 7:16 AM (0/0)

Status quo denies access to real domain name consumers — kentpilkington, June 19 @ 5:20 AM (1/1)

Very gullible — GeorgeK, June 19 @ 6:46 AM (0/0)

Legal Analysis of Standard of Review of ICANN re: New Registry Services — Cameron Powell, June 19 @ 3:56 AM (3/3)

Cut the bull — askii, June 20 @ 12:00 AM (0/0)
Verisign must get their legal analysis from prepaidlegal — chip-y, June 19 @ 9:03 PM (0/0)
Flawed — GeorgeK, June 19 @ 6:55 AM (0/0)

What WLS was to solve!!!!! — dmwascher, June 18 @ 6:47 AM (1/2)

Verisign admits load isn't an issue — GeorgeK, June 18 @ 8:08 AM (1/1)

Verisign has 2 stories — dmwascher, June 18 @ 4:48 PM (0/0)

WLS Policy Issues — dyounger, June 14 @ 9:03 PM (0/0)

Why registrants need a grace period — Dan Knight, June 7 @ 5:54 PM (1/1)

I agree, but this already exists at most registrars — GeorgeK, June 14 @ 6:44 PM (0/0)

Proposed WLS — hlhoffman, June 1 @ 3:04 AM (2/2)

Not fair to consumers or other business models — GeorgeK, June 14 @ 6:35 PM (0/0)
Fair? — jberryhill, June 5 @ 7:05 AM (0/0)

If WLS is not renewed after the one year "test"..... — davidhale, May 28 @ 11:00 PM (0/0)

Re-Distribution of Expired Names needs a more open public process — richard04, May 25 @ 4:43 PM (1/1)

I agree but the discussion doesn't appear headed there — totoole, June 20 @ 4:41 AM (0/0)

Verisign's WLS proposal just highlights their conflict of interest. — ruadhraigh, May 24 @ 12:18 AM (1/1)

THE EMPIRE STRIKES NAK! — MEO, June 21 @ 11:45 PM (0/0)

Effect of current WLS proposal on competition among registrars — roessler, May 22 @ 8:15 PM (0/0)

Win-lose proposal — im1, May 21 @ 6:14 AM (0/0)

WLS = conflict of interest = domain hoarding by Verisign — eyeondomain.com, May 21 @ 4:01 AM (3/3)

WLS for Verisign — pac, June 17 @ 4:14 PM (0/0)
conflict of interest - absolutely — davidhale, May 25 @ 12:46 AM (0/0)
how about websitegroup.com = exp date = Aug 1998 — eyeondomain.com, May 21 @ 5:45 AM (0/0)

WLS is anti-competitive — GeorgeK, May 20 @ 5:45 AM (0/0)

856 Total headers