[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft 4



Onno and all,

Onno Hovers wrote:

> > >Richard J. Sexton <richard@ns1.vrx.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Have a look at http://www.iana.org, and read the NSI/IANA
> > >> proposal.
> > >> Is there concensus that this should be acepted as is or should
> > >> there be a further meeting for ratification/analysis/discussion ?
> > >
> > >In any case, the suggestion that people should respond within two days
> > >by phone and may make only small changes is ridiculous.
> > >I hope NSI/IANA are wise and will give the internet community more
> > >time to make up its mind.
> >
> > I'm not seeing a lot onconsensus that the NSI/ISNS proposal shoud
> > be accepted as is.
> >
>
> I am not a stakeholder, but just an interested observer that
> has been lurking these lists. But I am wondering. Is anybody
> outside of NSI/IANA really happy with the current draft?

  So far I have only found two individuals that are partly or completely
in favor of the current NSI/IANA Draft proposal for the ICANN, as they
are calling it.

>
>
> --
> Onno Hovers (onno@surfer.xs4all.nl)
> "In the future, technology will become the leading cause of death"
>  from Scott Adams, The Dilbert Future
>
> --
> DOMAIN-POLICY administrivia should be sent to <listserv@lists.internic.net>
> To unsubscribe send a message with only one line "SIGNOFF DOMAIN-POLICY"
> For more help regarding Listserv commands send the one line "HELP"

 Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com




Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy