ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[At-Large Advisory Committee]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [alac] ICANN blows off Ed Hasbrouck

  • To: johnl@xxxxxxxx, alac@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: RE: [alac] ICANN blows off Ed Hasbrouck
  • From: "Roberto Gaetano" <alac_liaison@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:22:19 +0000

What I do not like is that action from ICANN is required in order to have an independent review.
A reasonable approach would be that a person who feels materially damaged by an ICANN action could start the appeal, and then it would be a problem of him/her and the court of appeal to agree on format, receivability, applicability, etc.
Obviously, a discussion is going on in the Board at this time, and this is the position I am presenting (long term solution). For the short term, I would be inclined to recommend the Board to let the appeal go to the ICC for IRP, but I would like to see discussion going in ALAC before presenting a position.
ICANN BoD Liaison

From: "John R Levine" <johnl@xxxxxxxx>
To: "ALAC" <alac@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [alac] ICANN blows off Ed Hasbrouck
Date: 19 Jan 2006 23:21:27 -0500

Ed Hasbrouck writes about his latest correspondence from ICANN, in which
John Jefferiwes says that merely because Vint made a public promise to do
the independent review of .TRAVEL that Ed requested, as required by the
ICANN bylaws, doesn't mean that they actually will, or that if they did
they would do anything meaningful:


Also see Bret's comments, entitled "ICANN is Never Wrong":


John Levine, johnl@xxxxxxxx, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, Mayor
"I shook hands with Senators Dole and Inouye," said Tom, disarmingly.

Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy