ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[At-Large Advisory Committee]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[alac] RE: dot travel wildcard, take 2bis

  • To: "'ALAC -- ALAC'" <alac@xxxxxxxxx>, <alac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [alac] RE: dot travel wildcard, take 2bis
  • From: "Roberto Gaetano" <roberto@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 18:50:28 +0200

I obviously meant "if there are any objections".
I don't have any ;>)

Roberto Gaetano
ALAC
ICANN Board Liaison
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: alac-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:alac-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Roberto Gaetano
> Sent: 07 October 2006 18:26
> To: 'John L'; 'ALAC -- ALAC'; alac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: dot travel wildcard, take 2bis
> 
> I will wait until tomorrow, to see if I have objections, then 
> will forward.
> 
> Roberto Gaetano
> ALAC
> ICANN Board Liaison
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: alac-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:alac-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John L
> > Sent: 06 October 2006 15:47
> > To: ALAC -- ALAC; alac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: dot travel wildcard, take 2bis
> > 
> > Given the utter unanimity I've heard on the list and 
> yesterday's phone 
> > call, I think we can send out the note I drafted on the .travel 
> > wildcard as the ALAC's consensus position.  Here's a final version, 
> > the same as last time other than a few grammar and spelling 
> > improvements.
> > 
> > Roberto, can you pass this along to the board?
> > 
> > R's,
> > John
> 




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy