RE: [alac] Re: Reply from ALAC Chair

["Roberto Gaetano" <roberto@xxxxxxxxx>]

Just for the record, I have been unsubscribed from the Admin list (I
explicitely asked for it).
The ALAC list, OTOH, is publicly posted, so to unsubscribe past members
would not help confidentiality.

Regards,
Roberto
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-alac@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-alac@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Sebastian Ricciardi
> Sent: 05 January 2007 18:43
> To: fowlie@xxxxxxxxx; 'Annette Muehlberg'; 'Nick 
> Ashton-Hart'; 'Vittorio Bertola'
> Cc: alac@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [alac] Re: Reply from ALAC Chair
> 
> Dear Annette, Frank and ALAC Members,
> 
> Due to our usual administrative challenges while handling the 
> e-mail lists, I am still subscribed to ALAC and ALAC Admin.
> 
> Thus, I am receiving all your messages, including those 
> coming from Frank, that are confidential under the ombudsman rules. 
> 
> Please be advised on this. I´ll delete any communication 
> older than 2006 coming from the ombudsman from my computer.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Sebastian Ricciardi
> 
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: owner-alac@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-alac@xxxxxxxxx] En 
> nombre de Frank Fowlie Enviado el: Viernes, 05 de Enero de 
> 2007 01:46 p.m.
> Para: Annette Muehlberg; Nick Ashton-Hart; Vittorio Bertola
> CC: alac@xxxxxxxxx
> Asunto: [alac] Re: Reply from ALAC Chair
> 
> Dear Annette,
> 
> Thank you for your email.  I begin by noting that this is the 
> third time that the response time has been moved.  I also 
> restate my earlier comment that  one of my concerns is that 
> the overall delay towards the applicant is compounded.
> 
> I continue to await your response.
> 
> I again offer the invitation to individual members of the 
> ALAC to contact me diretly with any information they may wish 
> to share.
> 
> 
>  
> Frank Fowlie
> Ombudsman
> ICANN   
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Annette Muehlberg <annette.muehlberg@xxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 15:57:24
> To:fowlie@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Reply from ALAC Chair
> 
> Dear Frank,
> 
> my answer is ready, but I could not get back to the committee 
> yet - weekend is a better time for volunteers. So if it is ok 
> with you  I would like to send the answer to you, that you 
> have it when you start work on monday morning. Is that ok 
> with you? Otherwise we could get in touch today.
> 
> All the best
> 
> Annette
> 
> Frank Fowlie schrieb:
> > Super, thank you.  I look forward to your information.
> >  
> > Frank Fowlie
> > Ombudsman
> > ICANN   
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Annette Muehlberg <annette.muehlberg@xxxxxx>
> > Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 18:49:01
> > To:fowlie@xxxxxxxxx
> > Cc:Nick Ashton-Hart <nashton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,       
> Vittorio Bertola
> <vb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: Reply from ALAC Chair
> >
> > Dear Frank,
> >
> > Happy new year to you too.
> > You will receive the reply tomorrow.
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Annette
> >
> >
> > Frank Fowlie schrieb:
> >   
> >> Happy new year Nick and Annette.
> >>
> >> I am writing to advise that I have yet to have a reply, either by 
> >> email
> or voice, to my requests for information from the ALAC chair. 
>  In my previous correspondence I had asked for a response by 
> January 3.  This has not been replied to.
> >>
> >> As Bylaw V allows the Ombudsman access to all information held by 
> >> ICANN,
> and as I wish to be as fair and balanced in my evaluation as 
> possible, a response on these issues by the ALAC committee is 
> not only desireable, but ethical.
> >>
> >> May I please receive a firm (but short) date as to when I 
> may receive 
> >> the
> response from the Chair?  Due to the time lag, I would prefer 
> to have this on the record, and to receive this by email, as 
> well as the response itself.
> >>
> >> I note that the delay in responding to my Office compounds 
> any delay
> issue with respect to the applicant.
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >>
> >> Frank
> >>  
> >> Frank Fowlie
> >> Ombudsman
> >> ICANN   
> >>
> >>   
> >>