<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[bc-gnso] Re: comments on the IRT draft report
- To: <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [bc-gnso] Re: comments on the IRT draft report
- From: "BC Secretariat" <secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 07:34:11 +0200
Posted by the secretariat on behalf of Mike Rodenbaugh
It 'started out' as a proposal thought likely to deter cybersquatting. It
has failed that purpose, but it still is designed to address cybersquatting
cases only, rather than 'garden variety' trademark cases. And it is still
better than nothing.
Rest assured George, at least in the US, federal courts have no obligation
to give any deference to a UDRP panelist's decision once challenged.
Mike Rodenbaugh
Rodenbaugh Law
548 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94104
+1.415.738.8087
www.rodenbaugh.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|