ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[bc-gnso]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [bc-gnso] Members' archive of ExComm email list

  • To: <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Members' archive of ExComm email list
  • From: "Chris Chaplow" <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 01:09:18 +0100

Dear Mike,

 

The excom list is at present not archived.  

It is only a simple redirection of email by our webmaster.

 

There WOULD certainly be costs to have it archived.

 

If the will was to have this archived (open or closed) ??

 

My suggested solution would be to move it over to the ?ICANN system? as
ICANN they are experts at the ?majordomo? forward and archive system.

(Google groups offer this service for free and I imagine Ning as well.)

This is in line with the toolkit anyway.

 

As part of the toolkit and the above I hope to be able to sit down with
staff at Cartagena and work out a possible migration plan for the different
web services we have and would like in future.

 

Best regards, 

 

 

 

Chris Chaplow
Managing Director
Andalucía.com S.L.
Avenida del Carmen 9
Ed. Puertosol, Puerto Deportivo
1ª Planta, Oficina 30
Estepona, 29680
Malaga, Spain
Tel: + (34) 952 897 865
Fax: + (34) 952 897 874
E-mail:  <mailto:chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web:  <http://www.andalucia.com/> www.andaluciaws.com



 

De: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] En nombre de
Mike Rodenbaugh
Enviado el: miércoles, 01 de diciembre de 2010 23:54
Para: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Asunto: [bc-gnso] Members' archive of ExComm email list

 

I have proposed to the ExComm that we make an archive of our email list
available for Members, to promote professionalism in the ExComm and
transparency to our membership.  I anticipate the costs of that
implementation to be next to nil.  There has been no expressions of
disagreement amongst the ExComm.  Our Chair suggested this was relevant to
discussion of the BC Charter, but I do not think it requires a Charter
amendment or any further discussion other than on this List.

 

Are Members in favor of this?  Is there any opposition, and if so why?

 

Thanks,

Mike

 

Mike Rodenbaugh

RODENBAUGH LAW

tel/fax:  +1 (415) 738-8087

http://rodenbaugh.com <http://rodenbaugh.com/> 

 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy