[Fwd: Re: [bc-gnso] Who we are]

[philip.sheppard@xxxxxx]

---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Who we are
From:    philip.sheppard@xxxxxx
Date:    Thu, December 9, 2010 19:27
To:      john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc:      "Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
         "'bc - GNSO list'" <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

I hope the proposal that the Bc mission is rewritten to promite domain
portflio management was a joke.

Here's another one. What exactly is our councillor recall procedure ????

Philip


>  Marilyn,
> As we consider a rewrite of the Business Constituency's mission to better
> reflect who we are, we might begin with a review of the self-descriptors
> used in the round of introductions at our meeting with the new ICANN
> finance team.  The characteristics fell in two bucket:
> To prevent:
> FraudBrand abuseMalwarePhishingCybersquattingBarriers to e.commerce
>
> To promote:
> Domain portfolio managementTechnology architectureRisk
> managementInnovationEfficiencySecurityEasier e.commerceIP rightsTrademarks
> From this, we can build a case for membership in the BC that may resonate
> with companies.
> Just some raw material for consideration.
> Berard
>