Re: [bc-gnso] Who we are

["Marilyn Cade " <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Brainstorming on this is great /and I appreciate hearing from members on their 
views. 

I am pleased to report that Chris and I are in dialogue w 3 new prospects - 
which is a credit to the BC membership in conveying that the BC can be a good 
place to work. 

That is about all of you. 

We will see if they follow through, but at least preliminary discussions began. 
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

-----Original Message-----
From: frederick felman <ffelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 20:32:37 
To: <Jonathan.Matkowsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>; 
<philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>; <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Who we are

I think of it as a subset of online brand building and security...


On 12/10/10 12:22 PM, "Matkowsky, Jonathan" 
<Jonathan.Matkowsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I think domain portfolio management is one of many important business concerns. 


----------------
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx <owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx> 
To: Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>; John Berard 
<john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Cc: bc - GNSO list <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx> 
Sent: Thu Dec 09 12:18:00 2010
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Who we are 

I agree, domain name portfolio management isn't a BC issue per se./I think John 
is 'brainstorming' and we will just gather ideas and actually discuss different 
ideas later/I would add SSR, for instance.
....   and yes, I will put in a 
discussion about accountability of officers/councilors, including the duties to 
participate, consult, etc. 





> Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:27:27 +0100
> Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Who we are
> From: philip.sheppard@xxxxxx
> To: john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> CC: marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx; bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> I hope the proposal that the Bc mission is rewritten to promite domain
> portflio management was a joke.
> 
> Here's another one. What exactly is our councillor recall procedure ????
> 
> Philip
> 
> 
> >  Marilyn,
> > As we consider a rewrite of the Business Constituency's mission to better
> > reflect who we are, we might begin with a review of the self-descriptors
> > used in the round of introductions at our meeting with the new ICANN
> > finance team.  The characteristics fell in two bucket:
> > To prevent:
> > FraudBrand abuseMalwarePhishingCybersquattingBarriers to e.commerce
> >
> > To promote:
> > Domain portfolio managementTechnology architectureRisk
> > managementInnovationEfficiencySecurityEasier e.commerceIP rightsTrademarks
> > From this, we can build a case for membership in the BC that may resonate
> > with companies.
> > Just some raw material for consideration.
> > Berard
> >
> 
> 
       

[THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE 
OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE.  IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT 
THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR IS NOT THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR 
DELIVERING IT TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY 
DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY 
PROHIBITED.  IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS MESSAGE IN ERROR, PLEASE IMMEDIATELY 
NOTIFY US BY TELEPHONE OR REPLY BY E-MAIL AND THEN PROMPTLY DELETE THE MESSAGE. 
 THANK YOU.]