ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [bc-gnso] Proposed BC comment on ICANN proposed budget for 2012

  • To: "Steve DelBianco" <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Proposed BC comment on ICANN proposed budget for 2012
  • From: <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:30:43 -0700

<html><body><span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#000000; 
font-size:10pt;"><div>Steve,</div><div><br></div><div>These comments read well 
to me.&nbsp; I have but three suggestions, all of which are more nuance than 
substance.</div><div><br></div><div>First, in the WhoIs section, can we not 
give a nod to the view of the NCUC that for some people (e.g., dissidents in 
dangerous places), privacy is essential?&nbsp; I think the WhoIs database(s) 
ought to be accurate and secure.&nbsp; I am a big fan of tightly controlling 
access and the use of serious authentication 
protocols.</div><div><br></div><div>Second, I think we go too far in asking 
ICANN to spend money on itself.&nbsp; I realize compliance is an essential 
function, but less "pretty please" and more "ICANN's reputation 
requires."</div><div><br></div><div>Third, communications has many 
meanings.&nbsp; I would make sure we are clear in our meaning each time the 
word is used in the document.</div><div><br></div><div>That's is from (still 
rainy) San 
<blockquote id="replyBlockquote" webmail="1" style="border-left: 2px solid 
blue; margin-left: 8px; padding-left: 8px; font-size: 10pt; color: black; 
font-family: verdana;">
<div id="wmQuoteWrapper">
-------- Original Message --------<br>
Subject: [bc-gnso] Proposed BC comment on ICANN proposed budget for<br>
From: Steve DelBianco &lt;<a 
Date: Mon, March 21, 2011 7:16 pm<br>
To: "<a href="mailto:bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx";>bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx</a>" &lt;<a 
 <div><div><div>ICANN is now gathering public comment on its proposed framework 
for FY 2012 operating plan and 
budget.</div></div></div><div><br></div><div>Attached is a discussion draft for 
BC comments prepared by Chris Chaplow, our Vice Chair for Finance &amp; 
Administration. &nbsp;&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>(Those of you in San 
Francisco last week heard Chris summarize these comments in the Public Forum on 
Thursday. )</div><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" 
style="font-family: Arial;">ICANN's Comment period closes 4-April, so today 
(21-March) begins our 14-day review period for this discussion 
draft.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 
Arial;"><br></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" 
style="font-family: Arial;">Please review and post your suggestions/edits as 
soon as possible. &nbsp; If there are no disagreements noted by 30-March, these 
comments will be adopted without a voting period, and posted to ICANN on 
4-April.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 
Arial;"><br></span></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" 
face="Calibri,sans-serif"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 
Arial;">For topic background, see &nbsp;</span></font><font 
class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><a target="_blank" 
 again to Chris for his leadership on all ICANN financial and administrative 
issues.</div><div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt; 
font-size:12pt;; font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif;"><span style="font-size: 
11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125); font-family: Calibri,sans-serif;" 
lang="EN-US"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); 
font-size: 14px; font-family: 
DelBianco</div><div>Vice chair for policy 

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy