RE: [bc-gnso] ICANN transition Work Stream 2 meetings in Helsinki on 25-Jun

["Wilson, Christopher" <cwilson@xxxxxxxx>]

Perhaps a BC drinks huddle that Sunday night?  Other nights that week are 
booked for reception/cocktails, according to the schedule.

From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Marilyn Cade
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2016 6:49 PM
To: Steve DelBianco; BC List
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] ICANN transition Work Stream 2 meetings in Helsinki on 
25-Jun

thank you, Steve. I am committed to a different working group, but wonder if we 
might plan to have a 'drinks huddle' among BC members attending, if Chantelle 
might do a doodle about when all BC members are arriving.

Separately, I know that the Outreach committee, led by Andrew,and with several 
other members are examining options for outreach events/activities.

M

________________________________
From: sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [bc-gnso] ICANN transition Work Stream 2 meetings in Helsinki on 25-Jun
Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 17:31:22 +0000
BC Members — the CCWG-Accountability will hold meetings in Helsinki on Sunday 
25-Jun, from 8:30am to 5pm, to begin WORK STREAM 2 projects that will be 
addressed over next 12 to 16 months.

If you’d like to join any of the Work Stream 2 projects (listed below), please 
try to attend this face-to-face meeting.

ICANN’s draft new Bylaws include a transition article tasking the CCWG to 
develop further enhancements to ICANN’s accountability, known as Work Stream 2:

1.     Considering improvements to ICANN’s standards for diversity at all 
levels 

2.     Staff accountability 

3.     Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committee accountability

4.     Improving ICANN’s transparency with a focus on:
a.     Enhancements to ICANN’s existing Document Information Disclosure Policy

b.     Transparency of ICANN’s interactions with governments
c.     Improvements to the whistleblower policy
d.     Transparency of Board deliberations
5.     Developing a Framework of Interpretation for Human Rights
6.     Addressing jurisdiction-related questions
7.     Considering enhancements to the Ombudsman’s role and function
8.     Guidelines for good faith standards of conduct associated with removal 
of directors
9.     Reviewing the Cooperative Engagement Process (part of Independent Review 
Process)