Who represents the concerns of internet users?

["P. Bouster" <PBo1@xxxxxx>]

Provided the large amount of factual and precise data provided to the ombudsman 
by Garth Bruen on behalf of many internet users like me, it is very 
disappointing to see that his answer does not address the issues and does not 
provide data or references that can be verified.

Rogue registrars are the doors through which all sorts of illegal businesses 
enter internet, which have been a plague to internet users for years and 
refrain many from using it. Rogue registrars exist because ICANN does not 
enforce their obligations to them. Why?

Whether ICANN can't or won't doesn't matter, if it doesn't do its job, let it 
be terminated and replaced by a more competent entity.

ICANN including its CEO have not answered the issues submitted before. The 
Ombudsman being part of ICANN, it would have been surprising if he could have 
changed things. The role of the Ombudsman needs to be reviewed because he does 
not represent the concerns of the Internet user.

I fully support the comments provided by Garth Bruen listed here:
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-atrt2-recommendations-21oct13/msg00009.html";

Regards.
P. Bouster