[dssa] MP3 & AC Recording / DSSA 02 August 2012

[Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear All,



Please find the Mp3 recording from the DSSA-WG call on Thursday, 02 August 2012 
at:

http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-dssa-20120802-en.mp3



Please find the Adobe room presentation recording here:   
http://icann.adobeconnect.com/p4vi5nqbcet/


A transcript of the AC Chat can be found at the bottom of this email.



Transcript and Presentation will be posted shortly on:

http://gnso.icann.org/en/calendar/#aug


Attendees on the call:



At Large Members

. Olivier Crépin-Leblond (ALAC) (co-chair)

. Julie Hammer (ALAC)
. Cheryl Langdon-Orr (ALAC)
. Andre Thompson (At-Large)




ccNSO Members

. Takayasu Matsuura, .jp

. Rick Koeller, .ca (CIRA)

. Katrina Sataki.lv

. Luis Espinoza.cr



GNSO Members

. Mikey O'Connor - (CBUC) (co-chair)
. Don Blumenthal - (RySG)
. Rosella Mattioli (NCSG)
. George Asare-Sakyi (NCSG)



SSAC members:

. Jim Galvin (SSAC)


ICANN Staff:

. Bart Boswinkel

. Nathalie Peregrine



Apologies:

. Rafik Dammak

. Mark Kosters

. Don Blumenthal

. Warren Kumari

. Jacques Latour

. Julie Hedlund

. Patrick Jones







** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list **



Link to Working Group Wiki space: 
https://community.icann.org/display/AW/Joint+DNS+Security+and+Stability+Analysis+Working+Group



Let me know if you have any questions.



Thank you.

Kind regards,

Nathalie Peregrine for



GNSO Secretariat

gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx>





AC Chat transcript 02 August 2012:

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:perhaps they can be RE Activated and complemented as 
required  FOR  the RA part of out Job then

  Nathalie  Peregrine:Katrina Sataki has joined the call

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:option 1 or 2  NOT 3 of what Jim oiutlined  sits  best 
with me  WE need to get to an RA  phase   and  YES  to a reconstitution is OK 
from MY POV  and  our  Charter  should be able to cope with only a little tweek 
if needs be...

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:re constitution is OK as opposed to stop and new action 
under new group...

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:yup gree woth  OCL here  we have to do some  RA work  (via 
reconstited and bolstered participants if needs be

  Luis Espinoza .cr:If we take the risk assesment process to a open public 
forum with in ICANN, in behalf of keeping within the WG?

  Julie Hammer:Also the Board WG is only looking at ICANN the organisation, not 
ICANN the community.

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:Yes  indeed  Julie  EXACTLY

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:the Charter always  considered this WG  using  sub comms  
of itself  or fresh for aspects of our work and specofocally RA bits of work 
thus the whole confidentiality  section...

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:and I'm OK woith  this aspect of OUR  work on this geing  
go live  post Toronto  BTW

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:cathc up AND be better clarified

  Rick Koeller:do we know what skill set we fell we are missing to perform the 
RA?

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:Gree Julie  the AC & SO line up changes  as at that time

  Olivier Crepin-Leblond:Good question Rick!

  Julie Hammer:The skills set would be dictated by the 5 risk 
scenarios...people with knowledge and skills in those scenario areas.

  Rick Koeller:i think if we are missing skills we need to identify our gap in 
time for Toronto in order to  recruit  others to contribute to the RA

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:Yes  Rick

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:annd Julie  indeed  we have  NOW got more to properly work 
with AT  Toronto...

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:true  OCL  goos point  to make

  Julie Hammer::-)

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:guilty as charged re the process focus  attraction  
observation OCL  =>  Yup

  Rick Koeller:i know that here at CIRA, Jacques and I have brought some of our 
systems people in to contribute to the DNSSec risk.

  Rick Koeller:within organizations with systems people we can draw upon 
inhouse expertise to contribute to the RA work when ever that occurrs

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:noted  Rick and it is the ability to access that sort of 
talent / skell set / experience that we need to ensure WE have dione  in the 
next phase

  Rick Koeller:great :-)

  Julie Hammer:Allow our decisions to be better informed!

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:well said  Julie :-)

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:sounds like were all in agreemennt then

  Olivier Crepin-Leblond:violently

  Rick Koeller:yes i like the outcome of today's meeting

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:yup Mikey  it seem  MORE than reasonable   to go for 
review of upper left qudrant

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:Note the neqr pefect consensus  to your 'poll' quesrion 
Mikey...

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:sounds like a plan

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:bye all...

  Katrina Sataki:bye! thanks!

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:THANKMikey...