Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Outcome of survey + updated conclusions and recommendations chapter

[Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>]

Please find attached an updated version that has incorporated this proposed 
change. Please share your comments / suggestions with the mailing list.

Thanks,

Marika


On 6/30/09 9:01 PM, "Mike Rodenbaugh" <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



I agree with Joe.  Thx.

Mike Rodenbaugh
Rodenbaugh Law
548 Market Street
San Francisco, CA  94104
+1.415.738.8087
www.rodenbaugh.com


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joe St Sauver
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 9:43 AM
To: jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: gnso-ff-pdp-May08@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Outcome of survey + updated conclusions and
recommendations chapter


James mentioned:

#I agree that this language is not clear.  We are certainly making
#recommendations for future work, which may include policy development.
#The current report, however, doesn't contain any immediate changes to
#consensus policy.
#
#Can you recommend alternative wording that would satisfy your concerns?

I would suggest striking most of the first paragraph under "Recommended Next
Steps", leaving only,

  "The Working Group would like to put forward the following ideas for
  further consideration by the GNSO Council:"

That's really all that's needed by way of introductory text there.

Regards,

Joe

Attachment: FF Conclusions and Recommended next steps - updated 1 July 2009.doc
Description: FF Conclusions and Recommended next steps - updated 1 July 2009.doc