Re: [gnso-idn-wg] One comment on techno-policy details

[Will Rodger <wrodger@xxxxxxxxx>]

Avri Doria wrote, of confusingly similar labels:
> e.g. while i find .com and .kom sufficiently different i am sure 
> others won't.  many of the examples people have shown a moot as they 
> involve mixed script labels - which i think everyone accepts as 
> illegal.  the case of the homologue variants (visual identity with 
> different ascii representations) is an easy criteria to be objective 
> about, but if we go beyond that i think we will need not only explicit 
> definitions, but a vast set of examples to serve as a guide.
Agreed. Still, I am assuming that any rules we write will have to be 
interpreted fairly heavily over time, and by necessity rather than choice.

Will