Re: [gnso-idn-wg] Draft Outcomes Report - cont'd discussion on statement in 4.5.1

["Dr Tan Tin Wee" <tinwee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> "2. An IDN gTLD registry should limit the degree of script mixing and have a
> limit for the number of scripts allowed for its domain names. Such limits,
> with justifications, should be proposed by the IDN gTLD applicant and be
> evaluated for reasonableness."

Excellent draft. Can we also include
"... evaluated for reasonableness and in the context of the language(s)
involved."?

bestrgds
tin wee



---------- Original Message -----------
From: "Olof Nordling" <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:35:40 +0100
Subject: [gnso-idn-wg] Draft Outcomes Report - cont'd discussion on statement 
in 4.5.1

> Dear all,
> As agreed during the IDN WG call today, I start a thread to further
> elaborate on the statement in item 2 under "Other considerations..." at the
> end of 4.5.1
> 
> The starting point was the phrasing in the 14 March draft:
> "2. There should be an overall limit, i.e. no more than <x> number of
> languages/scripts in an IDN gTLD. The method for determining such a limit
> remains to be defined."
> 
> Comments stated that the limit shouldn't necessarily be the same for all,
> that the applicant should provide input for any limit, that the applicant
> should declare how to limit the degree of script mixing, and more...
> 
> Maybe, just maybe, the following drafting could better capture the views:
> "2. An IDN gTLD registry should limit the degree of script mixing and have a
> limit for the number of scripts allowed for its domain names. Such limits,
> with justifications, should be proposed by the IDN gTLD applicant and be
> evaluated for reasonableness."
> 
> Now, over to you all for improvements or alternatives.
> 
> Best regards
> Olof
------- End of Original Message -------