Re: [gnso-idn-wg] On 4.4.2

["Alexei Sozonov" <sozon@xxxxxxxxx>]

Avri,

I guess with whatever "reduce confusion reason" I  did  not intend to 
imply special limited cases  like "variant script" . I am actually only 
against automatically aliasing all existing tld holders in name of 
"reduce confusion"


Alexei






-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [gnso-idn-wg] On 4.4.2
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:33:36 +0100
From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
To: gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx
References: <45FECE2F.70406@xxxxxxxxx> 
<006c01c76a53$814d38e0$6401a8c0@legato>



On 19 mar 2007, at 19.21, Alexei Sozonov wrote:

> Strange, if any fair person would support aliasing (critically  
> sensitive for locals issue) for whatever "reduce confusion" reason.

well, i think we need to differentiate:

- there is a notion of granting automatic aliasing to all existing  
tld holders.  I do not know how strong the support for that is, but  
it is certainly not something i support.  and it is not, as far as i  
can, envisioned in the current discussions.

- there is the notion of limited aliasing for idn applicants that i  
have been advocating which i do believe is a reasonable facilitation  
mechanism.

Which notion of aliasing are you referring to?

a.






-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.413 / Virus Database: 268.18.13/726 - Release Date: 3/18/2007