RE: [gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] IRTP WG C IRT Kick-off
Thanks, James. The schedule/project plan is indeed topic #1. But I think the bigger question - how does this fit into all of the rest of the work underway? - is probably outside this group's remit. My team (on staff) is currently mapping out all of the implementation items we see on the horizon and trying to figure out a way to manage those in a responsible way. I think, ultimately, it might require a discussion with the GNSO council, but that's as far as my thinking has progressed to date... Happy to discuss on the call if you and others like. Best, Mike Zupke Director, Registrar Programs Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers From: James M. Bladel [mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 6:01 PM To: Mike Zupke; gnso-impl-irtpc-rt@xxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] IRTP WG C IRT Kick-off Mike and Team: What is ICANN's plan w.r.t. scheduling this implementation? We are still working on Rec 9 of IRTP-B, ERRP, TMCH, and soon New gTLDs and the 2013 RAA. I'm concerned that these changes are starting to work against each other, and are definitely contending for the same development resources. Recommend we make this Agenda Topic #1 during our first call. Thanks-- J. From: Mike Zupke <Mike.Zupke@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 16:39 To: "gnso-impl-irtpc-rt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-impl-irtpc-rt@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: [gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] IRTP WG C IRT Kick-off Greetings! Welcome to the Transfer Policy Working Group C Implementation Review Team ("IRTPWGCIRT"). I will be leading ICANN's implementation of the GNSO's IRTP C recommendations, and it is my pleasure to have the opportunity to work with you on this effort. As a refresher, the GNSO made 3 recommendations that were adopted by the ICANN Board: 1. Modify the IRTP / Create a consensus policy that would apply to inter-registrant transfers. 2. Revise the existing Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy related to the expiration of the Form of Authorization used by registrars during transfers. 3. Require registries to include registrars' GURIDs (aka IANA IDs) in Whois output. Recommendation 3 is currently being implemented by Staff, so that leaves recs 1 & 2 for us. There is quite a bit of work to be done on these, so I've created a project plan that I'd like to share with you for feedback on a kick-off call. If you're interested in attending, would you kindly enter your availability in this doodle poll?: http://doodle.com/7uq5vaiyu7n8fpu8 Thanks in advance. I look forward to working with you. Sincerely, Mike Zupke Director, Registrar Programs Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Attachment:
smime.p7s
|