RE: [gnso-irtpd] Re: TDRP stats

["Knight, Barbara" <BKnight@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Kevin,
That information is a bit more difficult to get to as a dispute may also be 
filed if the registrar of record denies a transfer request for a reason that is 
not listed in Section A(3) of the IRTP.  I am checking to see if we have any 
reporting that would provide any insight into this.



Barbara Knight
Director of Registry Compliance
bknight@xxxxxxxxxxxx

m: 703-622-1071 t: 703-948-3343
12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190

VerisignInc.com<http://www.verisigninc.com/>


[Description: Verisign™]



From: owner-gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
Of Kevin Erdman
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 12:10 PM
To: Lars Hoffmann; gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-irtpd] Re: TDRP stats

Dear Lars,

Given Barbara’s explanation that the resolution of each dispute always has a 
winner and loser, is it possible to get statistics on how many transfers were 
reversed after the TDRP versus how many transfers that were not reversed?
____________________________
Kevin R Erdman
Reichel IP LLP
212 West 10th Street, Suite D-280
Indianapolis, IN 46202
voice 317.677.0689
fax 317.454.1349
skype kevimundo
web www.reichelip.com<http://www.reichelip.com>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Lars Hoffmann<mailto:Lars.hoffmann@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 10:56 AM
To: gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-irtpd] Re: TDRP stats

Dear Barbara,

Thank you for the quick reply and useful information.
This means then that the total number of cases was 152 in the period between 
October 2009 and March 2013.

Breaking down as follows:

.com = 142 (93.4%)
.net = 8 (5.3%)
.pro = 2 (1.3%)

Best wishes,
Lars





From: <Knight>, Barbara Knight 
<BKnight@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:BKnight@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Friday, April 26, 2013 15:23 PM
To: Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:lars.hoffmann@xxxxxxxxx>>, 
"gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: RE: TDRP stats

Lars,
Thank you for sending along the spreadsheet. You are correct that the Transfers 
disputed won and the Transfers disputed lost numbers are the same because for 
each case, there is a “winning” registrar and a “losing registrar”.  Likewise, 
the number of Transfers disputed nodecision cases should actually be divided by 
2 as these numbers also would have two registrars that were parties to the case 
and neither prevailed.  Hope this helps to explain the numbers a bit.  Thank 
you.



Barbara Knight
Director of Registry Compliance
bknight@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bknight@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

m: 703-622-1071 t: 703-948-3343
12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190

VerisignInc.com<http://www.verisigninc.com/>


<!--[if !vml]-->[Description: Verisign™]<!--[endif]-->



From: owner-gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Lars Hoffmann
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 4:01 AM
To: gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-irtpd] FW: TDRP stats

And just in case, you actually would like to see the promised spreadsheet …
Apologies,
Lars


From: Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:lars.hoffmann@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Friday, April 26, 2013 9:59 AM
To: "gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: TDRP stats

Dear all,

In light of the Group's discussion on TDRP we have  been in touch with transfer 
dispute providers to provide us with data from the cases they receive. We will 
share this with the group as soon as we have received and collated the relevant 
information.

In addition, we gathered some Registry-related TDRP data that might be useful 
to the discussion, too. I have attached a spreadsheet containing one sheet on 
the TDRP per TLD and a second sheet with an overview of the total number of 
TDRPs per month – both data sets are for the period of October 2009 to March 
2013.

You might notice that the numbers for 'lost' and 'won' TDRP are exactly the 
same each month. As this is too much of a coincidence, we assume that these 
represent the same case (as one party lost it and another won it) -  but maybe 
a working group member of the RySG might be able to clarify further.  Assuming 
that our assumption is correct the breakdown per TLD shows that:

of 227 total cases between October 2009 and March 2013

224 concerned .com (94.3%)
11 concerned .net (4.8%)
2 concerned .pro (0.9%)

For those of you interested, the data for these tables were sourced from the 
monthly Registry Reports filed with ICANN, see 
http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registries/reports

With best wishes from rainy Brussels,
Lars