RE: [gnso-irtpd] here's the little summary of that sequence of events i rattled off on the call just now -- registrant role in TDRP

["Rob Golding" <rob.golding@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Volker Greimann wrote ...

> you are assuming that registrants should be beneficiaries of the TDRP.
> They are not. Therefore a registrar not initiating a TDRP is not
> blocking the registrants access as they do not have such an access in
> the first place.

Summed up very nicely :)

> If you want to give the registrant a way to force a registrar to
> initiate a proceeding against another registrar, that is another story,
> but that way needs to include an obligation of the registrant to pay the
> costs and a right of a registrar to charge for this service (to cover
> the work needed to handle the process).

And it would need to be 'pay the initial fees upfront' and 'no refunds'
clauses.

Rob