<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-irtpd] here's a lightly reworded version of the scenarios we described on the call today
- To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-irtpd] here's a lightly reworded version of the scenarios we described on the call today
- From: Holly Raiche <h.raiche@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 08:50:18 +1100
Hi Mikey
The one I would add is the proxy situation where the admin contact is the proxy
- most likely a lawyer, but acting on behalf of the client. Either the law
firm goes bust or the lawyer/law firm tries to keep the name - or possibly does
not identify that they are acting on behalf of the client who - in legalese -
should be the beneficial owner.
Holly
On 10/12/2013, at 7:39 AM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
>
> hi all,
>
> the subject says it all. here are the scenarios we came up with. i have two
> requests. see if i captured them right, if you were proposing them. try to
> think up other cases that we need to include in our list.
>
> thanks,
>
> mikey
>
> Scenarios
>
> The Administrative Contact authorises a transfer but the Registrant is
> challenging that
>
> A Registrar is not participating in resolving an issue with a transfer.
> Several attempts to engage have been made by the other Registrar, including a
> message the Emergency Action Contact, to no avail.
>
> Two registrants are disputing the right to a domain name after an
> inter-reigistrar transfer -- registrars went through the right process and
> have no further information to add.
>
> Both registrants were acknowledged at some point in time as being
> registrants. Both of their names have appeared in Whois, but they now
> disagree as to who the true registrant is.
>
> +- Administrative and Registrant contacts are spread across two parts of an
> organization and there's a disagreement between them as to the validity of a
> transfer
>
> Different contacts or departments within an organization have conflicts
> +- A registrant-claimant approaches a Registrar claiming that they are the
> registrant rather than the Proxy Service Provider to whom the domain name is
> registered
>
> Maybe refer this edge case to the PPS WG?
> Proxy is acting as an agent
> Maybe a subset of the "confusion of roles within an organization" case
> +- One registrant is completely unknown to the registrars
>
> A website designer registers a domain under their name on behalf of a
> customer for whom they build a website. They are challenged by their
> customer who claims to be the registrant but has never appeared in any Whois
> record at any time.
>
> A website designer registers a domain under their name on behalf of a
> customer, and then goes out of business - causing domain to expire, leaving
> registrants to resolve the issue with a registrar who has never heard of them.
>
> +- Registrant says "I'm the owner, but I'm not in control of the name, here's
> why, help me get it back"
>
> Two business partners split and claim rights on the domain name
> Contract disputes sometimes enter into this
> Company goes through an ownership/structure change -- the original owner
> tries to retain the name
> +- Privacy services -- losing registrar doesn't remove privacy service, the
> gaining registrar can't validate the identity of the person registering the
> name
>
> This is also the case for any other entity that's providing the privacy
> service -- resellers or other 3rd parties for example
>
> Somebody registers a domain name as part of their job, does it under their
> own personal account, they and company part ways, which trumps?
>
> Person works at the company -- maybe in the corporate account -- their
> contact info is listed -- they have left the company and access to the
> account and controlling email address is no longer possible
>
> PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE:
> OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|