<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-irtpd] Transfer stats as discussed on the call
- To: Rob Golding <rob.golding@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-irtpd] Transfer stats as discussed on the call
- From: Volker Greimann <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 18:25:29 +0200
Indeed, it is an issue we see as well. The only solution we have is to:
a) send the FOA to both registrant and Admin-C
b) advise the customer clearly and plainly of the steps needed to
complete the transfer
c) do more b) as part of the process to transfer
The statistics you quoted are interesting though. As most of our
transfer request are provided to us by our resellers, we are unable to
do the same with regard to verification of the customer details, and
therefore cannot differentiate between authorized and unauthorized
transfer requests beyond doing the FOA and verifying the Auth-code.
Volker
Am 12.05.2014 18:19, schrieb Rob Golding:
actually, there is no need for any action with regard to the FoA from
the losing registrar. The only FOA requiring registrant action is the
FOA sent by the gaining registrar.
Typo :)
1131 transfers failed at least once due to FOA issues
986 either didnt get, didnt understand or didnt realise they needed to
follow the FOA from the losing registrar
s/be
986 either didnt get, didnt understand or didnt realise they needed to
follow the FOA as well as instructions from the losing registrar
Rob
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|