[gnso-lockpdp-wg] RE: Surveys for review & Proposed Agenda

["Roache-Turner, David" <david.roacheturner@xxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Marika.

The format of the transformed survey looks much more user friendly, though some 
further comments (additional to those previously submitted on individual 
questions and substantive text, with apologies for the cross-over) include:


 *   May want to consider inclusion of a preliminary question (possibly for 
both surveys) asking the responder to indicate the approximate number of UDRP 
disputes of which they have had experience.  This may also help the group down 
the track in considering how best to weigh received results.  Percentages 
(especially in ranges) and medians which are accompanied by an indication of 
the underlying numbers on which they are based are likely to give us a much 
richer picture than percentages ("percentage of what?") and medians in the 
abstract.
 *   May want to consider inclusion of a further button under each question to 
cover off situations where there is insufficient data available to the 
responder, or it is otherwise not practical for them to provide the information 
in the form sought (e.g. "requested data unavailable").   The questions all 
seem to presuppose an answer (whether in the stipulated ranges, or in some 
other form) can actually be provided by the party to which the question is 
being directed, which in the case of a number of the provider questions we 
doubt will be the case.  For example, in questions 8, 9 and 10, doubtful how a 
provider would be in a position to know whether it may be the registrar's lock, 
or some other factor, which may be preventing the mentioned changes in 
registrant data.   Where the requested data is unavailable, may be better to 
have a field which transparently indicates this, and the group can then 
consider where such missing data might then be better obtained.

Anyway, sorry to be only now coming in a bit late, and looking forward to 
joining the continuing discussion momentarily.

Regards,
David and Brian


________________________________
From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: mercredi, 23. mai 2012 21:20
To: Roache-Turner, David; Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Beckham, Brian
Subject: Re: Surveys for review & Proposed Agenda

Thanks, David and Brian for circulating your suggestions. I noted that one of 
your comments said 'it was suggested that consideration should be given to 
possibly rephrasing the Registrar and UDRP Service Provider questions as 
"yes-no"/"radio button" questions.  Having not yet seen a revised set of 
questions, please find below WIPO's suggested changes and comments to what we 
understand to be the last set of circulated questions'. Please note that if you 
click the links in the email below you will find the questions transformed into 
a survey with as many as possible yes/no questions, or ranges of answers given 
to make responding as easy as possible. You might want to have a look at those 
as well to see if it meets your expectations.

Best regards,

Marika

From: <Roache-Turner>, David 
<david.roacheturner@xxxxxxxx<mailto:david.roacheturner@xxxxxxxx>>
To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>, 
"Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: "Beckham, Brian" <brian.beckham@xxxxxxxx<mailto:brian.beckham@xxxxxxxx>>
Subject: RE: Surveys for review & Proposed Agenda

Thanks very much Marika.  Further to last week's discussion of the survey 
including the envisaged UDRP provider questions, attached are some WIPO 
comments, reservations (regarding certain aspects) and suggestions (in mark up) 
for the group's consideration ahead of discussion of item 2 in tomorrow's 
meeting.  We expect it is unlikely that UDRP providers would be in a position 
to conveniently provide detailed statistical information on a number of these 
questions (such data perhaps being more readily obtainable in some cases from 
responsible registrars or filing parties directly), although partial or 
anecdotal information based on provider observation, experience or 
representative case sample studies may still be reasonably and usefully 
obtained in certain respects.

Regards,
David and Brian

________________________________
From: owner-gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: mercredi, 23. mai 2012 10:04
To: Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] Surveys for review & Proposed Agenda

Dear All,

Please find below the proposed agenda for tomorrow's UDRP Domain Name Lock WG 
meeting. In order to facilitate the review of the outreach questions for 
registrars and UDRP providers, I've developed a zoomerang survey for each set 
of questions. As there seemed to be a preference from the WG to make responding 
to these survey as easy as possible, I've developed multiple choice answers 
where appropriate. In addition to the questions, please review these multiple 
choice options to make sure that the ranges given make sense. You can find a 
preview of the registrar survey at 
http://www.zoomerang.com/Survey/WEB22FS9UEJDUL/Preview and a preview of the 
survey for UDRP providers at 
http://www.zoomerang.com/Survey/WEB22FSZSKYZMT/Preview/Draft/. Feel free to 
share any comments and/or suggestions with the mailing list ahead of tomorrow's 
meeting.

With best regards,

Marika

Proposed Agenda - UDRP Domain Name Lock WG Meeting - 24 May 2012

 1.  Roll Call / SOI
 2.  Review and finalize survey for registrars / UDRP Providers
 3.  Request for input from other SG/C and SO/Acs - now, or in conjunction with 
public comment forum?
 4.  Continue development of work plan / approach
 5.  Planning for ICANN meeting in Prague
 6.  Next steps / confirm next meeting

World Intellectual Property Organization Disclaimer:

This electronic message may contain privileged, confidential and
copyright protected information. If you have received this e-mail
by mistake, please immediately notify the sender and delete this
e-mail and all its attachments. Please ensure all e-mail attachments
are scanned for viruses prior to opening or using.

World Intellectual Property Organization Disclaimer:

This electronic message may contain privileged, confidential and
copyright protected information. If you have received this e-mail
by mistake, please immediately notify the sender and delete this
e-mail and all its attachments. Please ensure all e-mail attachments
are scanned for viruses prior to opening or using.